How can I show that the continuous dual X' of a normed space X is complete?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The continuous dual X' of a normed space X over the fields K = R or C is proven to be complete, establishing that it is a Banach space. The discussion highlights that if a sequence of functionals f_n in X' is Cauchy, it converges pointwise to a functional f. The challenge lies in demonstrating that this functional f is both linear and continuous, with the continuity requiring a uniform convergence argument or an alternative approach involving Cauchy sequences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of normed spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with Cauchy sequences in functional analysis
  • Knowledge of linear functionals and their continuity
  • Concept of pointwise versus uniform convergence
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Banach spaces and their significance in functional analysis
  • Learn about uniform convergence and its implications for continuity of functionals
  • Explore the relationship between Cauchy sequences and convergence in normed spaces
  • Investigate examples of continuous dual spaces in various normed spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in functional analysis, graduate students studying advanced mathematics, and anyone interested in the completeness properties of dual spaces.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
[SOLVED] The continuous dual is Banach

Homework Statement


I'm trying to show that the continuous dual X' of a normed space X over K = R or C is complete.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have shown that if f_n is cauchy in X', then there is a functional f towards which f_n converge pointwise. Then I showed that the distance ||f_n - f|| can be made arbitrarily small. The only thing that remains then is to show that f is indeed linear and continuous. The linear part is easy but the continuous part eludes me.

To say a linear functional f is continuous is equivalent to saying that ||f||<+oo. But I can't conclude that from the fact that f_n --> f (pointwise). I would need f_n --> f (uniformly). Or I would need a whole other approach. Ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the fact that (f_n) is cauchy to find an N such that if n,m>=N then ||f_n - f_m|| < 1. Then use the inequality |f(x)| <= |f(x) - f_N(x)| + |f_N(x)|.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K