How Can I Simplify This Differential Equation to the Form dy/dx = F(ax + by)?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on simplifying the differential equation (a_{1}x + b_{1}y + c_{1})dx + (a_{2}x + b_{2}y + c_{2})dy = 0 to the form dy/dx = F(ax + by), under the condition a_{1}b_{2} = a_{2}b_{1}. Participants share their attempts, including solving for dy/dx and substituting variables, but encounter difficulties due to the presence of constants c1 and c2. A key insight suggests that the constants do not need to be eliminated for the equation to fit the desired form.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations and their forms
  • Familiarity with substitution methods in calculus
  • Knowledge of constants in mathematical functions
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of substitution in differential equations
  • Learn about the implications of constants in differential equations
  • Research the conditions for transforming differential equations into standard forms
  • Explore examples of functions of the form F(ax + by)
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying differential equations, as well as educators looking for insights into teaching simplification techniques.

chocok
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
1. I need to reduce [tex](a_{1}x + b_{1}y + c_{1})dx + (a_{2}x + b_{2}x +c_{2})dy = 0[/tex] to:

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} = F ( ax + by)[/tex]

with [tex]a_{1}b_{2} = a_{2}b_{1}[/tex]

i.e.:
[tex]a_{1}b_{2}=a_{2}b_{1}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{a_{2}}{a_{1}} = k[/tex] and [tex]\frac{b_{2}}{b_{1}} = k[/tex]

2.
First Try: I solved for dy/dx and tired to deal with the a's and b's. But I am still left with c1 and c2.
Second Try: I tried a different approach by letting x=m+h and y=n+k, then substitute it in and try to solve for h and k. But since the coefficient of dy has 2 x's instead of a x and y, i got a system of 2 "ugly" equations that lead nowhere... (or does it?)

I tried to used the 2 methods in different ways but it seems like I am running in circle.. Can anyone pls help??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chocok said:
1. I need to reduce [tex](a_{1}x + b_{1}y + c_{1})dx + (a_{2}x + b_{2}x +c_{2})dy = 0[/tex] to:

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} = F ( ax + by)[/tex]

with [tex]a_{1}b_{2} = a_{2}b_{1}[/tex]

i.e.:
[tex]a_{1}b_{2}=a_{2}b_{1}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{a_{2}}{a_{1}} = k[/tex] and [tex]\frac{b_{2}}{b_{1}} = k[/tex]

2.
First Try: I solved for dy/dx and tired to deal with the a's and b's. But I am still left with c1 and c2.
Second Try: I tried a different approach by letting x=m+h and y=n+k, then substitute it in and try to solve for h and k. But since the coefficient of dy has 2 x's instead of a x and y, i got a system of 2 "ugly" equations that lead nowhere... (or does it?)

I tried to used the 2 methods in different ways but it seems like I am running in circle.. Can anyone pls help??

Here's a hint: Would you consider [tex]\frac{u+2}{5u+10}[/tex] to be a function of [tex]u[/tex]?

How about [tex]\frac{u+c_1}{ku+c_2}[/tex] where [tex]c_1,&c_2,&k[/tex] are constants?

What about when [tex]u \equiv ax+by[/tex] where [tex]a \equiv a_1[/tex] and [tex]b \equiv b_1[/tex]?
 
chocok said:
1. I need to reduce [tex](a_{1}x + b_{1}y + c_{1})dx + (a_{2}x + b_{2}x +c_{2})dy = 0[/tex] to:

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} = F ( ax + by)[/tex]

with [tex]a_{1}b_{2} = a_{2}b_{1}[/tex]

First Try: I solved for dy/dx and tired to deal with the a's and b's. But I am still left with c1 and c2.
… But since the coefficient of dy has 2 x's instead of a x and y, i got a system of 2 "ugly" equations that lead nowhere... (or does it?)

Hi chocok! :smile:

It must mean [tex](a_{1}x + b_{1}y + c_{1})dx + (a_{2}x + b_{2}y +c_{2})dy = 0[/tex]

what you've been given is obviously a misprint! :redface:

And do you need to get rid of the constants, c1 and c2? …

for example, (ax + by + c1)2 + sin(ax + by + c2) + log(ax + by + c3) would still be of the form F(ax + by). :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K