How can I solve force vector mechanics without advanced concepts?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving force vector mechanics without advanced concepts, specifically in the context of circular motion. Participants analyze equations related to angular velocity, acceleration, and forces acting on a particle in motion. Key points include the need to resolve forces into horizontal and vertical components using trigonometry, as well as clarifying misconceptions about net torque and force. The conversation emphasizes that while advanced concepts like torque and cross products are not covered in the course, basic principles can still be applied to solve the problem effectively. Overall, the thread provides guidance on simplifying the problem using fundamental mechanics.
Mentallic
Homework Helper
Messages
3,802
Reaction score
95

Homework Statement


http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/6579/mechanics2.jpg

Homework Equations


w=\frac{d\theta}{dt} (1)

v=rw (2)

F=ma (3)

a=\frac{v^2}{r} (4)



The Attempt at a Solution


For (i), from (2) and (4) I get a=rw^2

and I'm thinking r=\frac{F}{cos\theta} but I'm not too sure about it.

So then I'm left with cos\theta=mw^2 for the horizontal component.

For the vertical, I'm just completely stumped. I tried something, but I know it's probably so wrong that posting it would be to make a mockery out of myself :blushing:

For (ii) I have N=mcos\theta(g-rw^2tan\theta)

and since mcos\theta>0 since m>0,cos\theta>0 ,0<\theta<\frac{\pi}{2}

I need to solve for w: g-rw^2tan\theta>0

Hence, -\frac{g}{r}cot\theta<w<\frac{g}{r}cot\theta

Is this correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


and I'm thinking r=\frac{F}{cos\theta} but I'm not too sure about it.
that can't be right, because F is a force vector (dealing with acceleration) and r is a position vector (which can be treated as a scalar here).

For uniform acceleration to occur, \vec{\tau}_{net}=\vec{F}_{net}\times\vec{r}=0, and we already know that r\neq0, so F_{net} must equal to 0. Then resolve it into x and y components.
 


zcd said:
that can't be right, because F is a force vector (dealing with acceleration) and r is a position vector (which can be treated as a scalar here).

For uniform acceleration to occur, \vec{\tau}_{net}=\vec{F}_{net}\times\vec{r}=0, and we already know that r\neq0, so F_{net} must equal to 0. Then resolve it into x and y components.

Sorry where did you get that equation from? I don't understand what
\vec{\tau}_{net} is.
 


I'm pretty sure that \taunet is the net torque on the particle P. Since the particle P does undergo uniform circular motion there is a torque on particle P, and he was simply using \taunet = Fnet x r = 0 to show you that since (r) isn't 0, Fnet must be equal to 0 in order to fulfill this equation.

Hope this helps!
 


ok thanks for that explanation.

So we need to resolve the x and y components. How can this be done?
 


zcd said:
For uniform acceleration to occur, \vec{\tau}_{net}=\vec{F}_{net}\times\vec{r}=0, and we already know that r\neq0, so F_{net} must equal to 0.

You seem to be claiming that for a cross product of two vectors to be zero, at least one of the vectors must be zero. That is a false claim.

As a counter example, consider the vectors \textbf{u}_1=2\textbf{i} and \textbf{u}_2=3\textbf{i}...what is their crossproduct? Are either of these vectors zero?
 


Mentallic said:
For (i), from (2) and (4) I get a=rw^2

Okay, and which direction is this acceleration in? What net force would cause such an acceleration?
 


Other posters note, the course Mentallic is doing does not cover cross/dot products, vectors in the "advanced" sense, torque etc . It only allows for elementary calculus to solve the problems.

Mentallic - The hard part is resolving the forces! For each vector, draw a right angled triangle so that one side is purely horizontal and the other is vertical. This need not be done for the always vertical mg force downwards. Find the lengths of the sides using trig and add up vertical components and horizontal components, taking care to have a negative sign when they are in opposite directions.

Then take gabbagabbahey's suggestion - Now that we have an expression for the vertical and horizontal components, what can we equate that to? In circular motion, what is the net force, what direction is it in. Hence, what must the components be equal to? Once you form those equations, the rest is relatively easy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K