How can I solve this free undamped oscillations of an elastic beam equation?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem concerns the free undamped oscillations of an elastic beam that is clamped at one end. The governing equation is a partial differential equation that involves separation of variables, leading to an eigenvalue problem for the spatial component.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the existence of a function Z(z) that satisfies the ordinary differential equation and the boundary conditions. There are mentions of using exponential functions and the challenges in fitting them to the boundary conditions. Some participants suggest checking the separation of variables process for potential mistakes.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different approaches, including the use of Laplace transforms and exponential methods. There is a recognition of the complexity involved in satisfying the boundary conditions, and some participants have shared their derived forms of the solution while questioning assumptions about the eigenvalue.

Contextual Notes

There are no initial conditions provided for the temporal part of the problem, as the focus is on finding the periods of oscillation and the shape of the solution for the spatial component. The discussion includes considerations of the values of the eigenvalue λ and their implications for non-trivial solutions.

Troels
Messages
125
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



The problem concerns the free undamped oscialtions of an elactic beam, clamped at one end.
The system is governed by a partial differential equation (one spatial dimension + time) which are to be solved by separation of the variables.

Constants:

E Young's Modulus, Real, and positive
I: Moment of inertia, real and positive
L: Lenght of the beam, real and positive

Homework Equations


after some preparations, one ends with the following eigenvalue equation for the spatial component:

[tex]EI\frac{d^4}{dz^4}Z(z)=\lambda Z(z)[/tex]
Where lambda is the separation constant and eigenvalue of the problem
With the boundary conditions:

  1. [tex]Z(0)=0[/tex]
  2. [tex]\left.\frac{d}{dz}Z(z)\right|_{z=0}=0[/tex]
  3. [tex]\left.EI\frac{d^2}{dz^2}Z(z)\right|_{z=L}=0[/tex]
  4. [tex]\left.EI\frac{d^3}{dz^3}Z(z)\right|_{z=L}=0[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I have now tried every trick 4 years of physics education have taught me, and I still cannot find any nontrivial solution to this equation. I only seem to get an insane misture of exponential functions, real and complex, with no obvious way to fit the BC's. Any thought or suggestions on how to tackle this one will be most helpfull.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What makes you suspect there exists a function Z(z) satisfying the ODE and the boundary conditions...?

Exponentials seem right, if you can't make them satify the boundary conditions, there is not much more you can try.

Maybe you made same mistake when seperating the original PDE.
 
Pere Callahan said:
What makes you suspect there exists a function Z(z) satisfying the ODE and the boundary conditions...?

Nothing, except my professors persistent claim that there does and that we are to find it without his help for a graded hand-it problem due for monday the 14th.

Pere Callahan said:
Maybe you made same mistake when seperating the original PDE

That is possible, but unlikely, as I have seperatet quite a number of PDEs over the years. But if you would like to check, the original equation is

[tex]\rho A \frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}x(z,t)+EI\frac{\partial^4}{\partial z^4}x(z,t)=0[/tex]

Then assume that [tex]x(z,t)=Z(z)T(t)[/tex]

Note that there is given no initial contitions on the temporal part, as we are only asked to find the periods of the oscilations (for which we need the eigenvalue) and their shape (for which we need a solution to the spatial part)
 
Troels said:
[tex]EI\frac{d^4}{dz^4}Z(z)=\lambda Z(z)[/tex]

I only seem to get an insane misture of exponential functions, real and complex …

Put µ^4 = λ/EI.

Then (d^4/dz^4)Z - (µ^4)Z

= [d^2/dz^2 + µ^2][d^2/dz^2 - µ^2]Z

= … ? :smile:
 
I assume that's what the OP did, getting

[tex] Z(z)=A_\pm e^{\pm i \mu z}\text{ and } Z(z)=B_\pm e^{\pm \mu z}[/tex],

the "insane mixture of exponentials." :smile:
 
Pere Callahan said:
I assume that's what the OP did, getting

[tex] Z(z)=A_\pm e^{\pm i \mu z}\text{ and } Z(z)=B_\pm e^{\pm \mu z}[/tex],

the "insane mixture of exponentials." :smile:

Well, I get a sum of cos sin cosh and sinh … I wouldn't call that insane … I end up with a formula for sinhµL/sinµL (… I think! :rolleyes:). :smile:
 
Are you assuming that [itex]\lambda[/itex] is positive or negative? The whole question was, for what values of [itex]\lambda[/itex] does this exist a non-trivial solution to the original equation that satisfies all the boundary conditions.
 
Okay, I think I got it now.

First, use a laplace transform method, as this can take care of BC 1 and 2 straight away. The solution is then:

[tex]Z(z)=c_1(\cosh(\omega z)-\cos(\omega z))+c_2(\sinh(\omega z)-\sin(\omega z)), \quad \omega = \sqrt[4]{\frac{\lambda}{EI}}[/tex]

(this can also be done using the exponential approach, but is is much more crumblesome)
Now, do a backdifferentiation, insert the remanings BCs and do about one page of closely packed calculations to eliminate the two constants and bring the equation on this form:

[tex]-\frac{2(\cosh(\omega L)\cos(\omega L)-1)}{\sinh(\omega L) - \sin(\omega L)} = 0[/tex]

The roots of this trancedental equation, which most of all resembles a Bessel function of the second kind determines the allowed (possitive) values of [tex]\omega[/tex] and thus [tex]\lambda[/tex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K