How can I use direct integration to solve for the convolution of two signals?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convolution of two signals in the context of continuous-time systems, specifically using direct integration to find the output response of an LTI system given an input signal and an impulse response.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how to apply direct integration for convolution, expressing confusion over the inequalities that arise during the integration process. Some participants question the interpretation of the unit step function in this context.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the challenges of setting up the convolution integral and interpreting the involved functions. There is a recognition of the complexity compared to previous examples, indicating a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the intricacies of the convolution integral, particularly in relation to the unit step function and the resulting inequalities that complicate the integration process.

Vanush
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I'm having trouble doing ct convolution

i'm trying to convolve two signals together ie, the input x(t) and the impulse response h(t). basically, knowing the impulse response of an LTI system, you can find out the response y(t) to any arbitrary input x(t) using the convolution integral.

in my problem

x(t) = t * ( u(t) - 2*( u(t - 1) + u(t - 2)),
h(t) = u(-t) - u(-t + 1)

So i had a look at examples of calculating the integral using the graphical method, and i get a triangle signal as y(t), convolving the signals above. however, the question wants me to do it using direct integration. I have no idea how to do this! Anyone have any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is u(t)?
 
Unit step function
 
He wasn't asking you what that notation meant, but how you should think of interpreting what it means when integrating it.
 
THat's the thing, when I put it into the integral I have to work out a bunch of inequalities that really makes my head spin. This question is so much harder than the example :(
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
14K