How Can Impulse-Momentum Theorem Be Applied to Springs?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying the impulse-momentum theorem to a mass M connected to an ideal spring on a frictionless surface. The participants derive that the maximum velocity of the mass, when compressed by a distance X, is given by the formula X * (K / M)^1/2. Key equations discussed include J = delta P and the relationship between acceleration and spring force, leading to the conclusion that maximum velocity occurs when acceleration is zero. The final verification confirms that the maximum speed in simple harmonic motion is indeed V_max = ±ωA, where ω = √(k/m).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the impulse-momentum theorem
  • Familiarity with simple harmonic motion (SHM) concepts
  • Knowledge of spring constants and Hooke's Law
  • Basic calculus for integrating motion equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the impulse-momentum theorem in detail
  • Learn about the characteristics of simple harmonic motion (SHM)
  • Explore the relationship between spring constants and mass in oscillatory systems
  • Investigate the integration of motion equations in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in mechanics, particularly those studying oscillatory motion and the dynamics of springs.

Thomas Brown
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
1. A mass M is connected to a wall by an ideal spring. The mass is on a frictionless surface. The mass is pushed toward the wall, compressing the spring by a distance X. Use the impulse-momentum theorem to demonstrate that the mass will reach a maximum velocity of X * (K / M)^1/2.

2. J = delta P, P = MV

3. J = delta P
Fn * t = MV - 0
-kx * t = MV What is t supposed to be? How can I finish this problem?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thomas Brown said:
1. A mass M is connected to a wall by an ideal spring. The mass is on a frictionless surface. The mass is pushed toward the wall, compressing the spring by a distance X. Use the impulse-momentum theorem to demonstrate that the mass will reach a maximum velocity of X * (K / M)^1/2.

2. J = delta P, P = MV

3. J = delta P
Fn * t = MV - 0
-kx * t = MV What is t supposed to be? How can I finish this problem?
What is ##\frac{\Delta v}{\Delta t}## and what would the question wanting the maximum imply?
 
Student100 said:
What is ##\frac{\Delta v}{\Delta t}## and what would the question wanting the maximum imply?
I see that delta V / delta T would be the acceleration and that the velocity would be greatest when acceleration is zero (maximum) but if I divide both sides by delta T I end up with:
-kx = m dV/dT
-kx = ma
Fn = ma
And I'm not really sure what I could do next...
 
Thomas Brown said:
I see that delta V / delta T would be the acceleration and that the velocity would be greatest when acceleration is zero (maximum) but if I divide both sides by delta T I end up with:
-kx = m dV/dT
-kx = ma
Fn = ma
And I'm not really sure what I could do next...

So you have ##a=\frac{-kx}{m}## or ##a={w^2}{x}##, is this looking familiar?
 
I think I got it but can you please verify? I know that a = w^2 x is the acceleration in SHM, so I integrated the A(t) formula to get V(t) = xw * sin(wt) and velocity is greatest when sin(wt) = 1 so the maximum velocity is xw, or v = x * (k / m)^1/2.
 
Thomas Brown said:
I think I got it but can you please verify? I know that a = w^2 x is the acceleration in SHM, so I integrated the A(t) formula to get V(t) = xw * sin(wt) and velocity is greatest when sin(wt) = 1 so the maximum velocity is xw, or v = x * (k / m)^1/2.

Yes, ##v(t)=- \omega xsin(\omega t)## when you take the phase constant to be zero. So what you said originally was true, the maximum speed in this motion occurs when the acceleration is zero, as well as when the displacement from equilibrium is the same. (Also applies for the min!) ##V_{max/min}= \pm \omega A## depending on the direction of oscillation ##V_{max}= \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}} x## depending on your coordinate system choosen.

Is this the best way to show what you wanted to show? I can't think of another way from the impulse-momentum theorem off the top of my head, but looks good to me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Thomas Brown
Yup, this makes sense! Thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
891
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K