How can increased altitude affect the trajectory of a fired projectile?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DuncP89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ballistics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the impact of increased altitude on the trajectory of a U.S. 37-MM projectile fired at a muzzle velocity of 792.48 m/s. The projectile's weight is 0.73 kg, and the drag force is calculated using the equation F = 1/2ρ*S*C*V^2. At higher altitudes, with atmospheric density at 0.98 kg/m^3 and temperature at 30°F, the projectile must be aimed 0.28 mil lower, equivalent to 0.01575 degrees lower, to accurately hit a target at 800 yards. The calculations involve adjusting the drag coefficient K2 and integrating the equations of motion to account for changing velocity and gravitational effects.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of projectile motion and ballistic equations
  • Familiarity with drag force calculations in fluid dynamics
  • Knowledge of atmospheric density variations and their effects on projectile trajectories
  • Proficiency in numerical integration techniques for differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of atmospheric density on projectile motion using advanced ballistic models
  • Learn about numerical methods for solving differential equations in physics
  • Explore the relationship between drag coefficient and projectile speed in detail
  • Investigate the variations in gravitational acceleration at different altitudes
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for ballistics engineers, physicists, and military personnel involved in projectile trajectory calculations and optimization at varying altitudes.

DuncP89
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This is NOT a school work/homework, it's just a problem relate to my personal interest found on a ballastics book. And I already converted all units into SI units to make it simple.
I tried but couldn't get to correct answer.
Please not a is speed of sound, K2 is a constant with equation.
The answer is 0.28 mil lower which is also 0.01575 degree lower.

Homework Statement


A U.S. 37-MM projectile is fired with a muzzle velocity of 2600ft's (792.48m/s). The projectile weighs 1.61 Ibm(0.73kg). Assuming K2 = 0.841[unitless] and using standard sea level met data(ρ=0.0751Ibm/ft^3 (1.2kg/m^3), a = 1120 ft/s (341.4m/s))
If this weapon is used at an increased altitude and assuming the density and temperature of the atmosphere are ρ=0.06Ibm/ft^3 (0.98kg/m^3) and T=30F degree, how much higher or lower will the weapon have to be aimed to hit a target at 800 yards.

Homework Equations


Drag force: F = 1/2ρ*S*C*V^2
S = πd^2/4 (d is diameter)
Cd = ρS/2m * K2*a/Vx = k2/Vx
Vx = Vx0*exp(-k2*t) ...t is time of flight ot any range x
Vy = (Vy0+g/k2)exp(-k2*t)-g/k2
t=x/Vx0 * ln(Vx0/Vx) / (1-Vx/Vx0)
tan∅ = tan∅0 + gx/Vx0^2((1-Vx0/Vx)/(1-Vx/Vx0)) ...∠∅ is the angle of fall and ∠∅0 is the initial launch angle
y = y0 + x*tan∅0 - (g*t^2/(2ln(Vx0/Vx)))

The Attempt at a Solution



I first assume the first firing is flat firing, so the initial launch angle is zero, after the increased altitude, i calculated the new k2 and then apply it into these two equations:
Vx = Vx0*exp(-k2*t) ...t is time of flight ot any range x
Vy = (Vy0+g/k2)exp(-k2*t)-g/k2
I assume the muzzle velocity is Vx at the halfway of the range since Vy and halfway of range is zero, i then manipulate these two equations to a form of Vy0/Vx0, and the do a inverse tan to get the initial launch angle.
but it doesn't work and i realized that muzzle velocity is not Vx at halfway since the moment the projectile went out, the velocity is changing. and i was stuck here
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would seem to me that in order to determine a difference in initial elevation based on different altitudes, you should be writing the differential equation describing the projectile motion and numerically integrating it. The drag force is a function of projectile speed. The drag coefficient itself is also a function of speed to some extent. There is also a slight difference in the acceleration of gravity at different altitudes if that were to be included.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
23K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
17K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K