How Can Laplace's Method Simplify This Integral?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ra_forever8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration Method
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on using Laplace's Method to simplify the integral \( I_n(x) = \int^{2}_{1} (\log_{e}t) e^{-x(t-1)^{n}}dt \) as \( x \rightarrow \infty \). It establishes that \( I_n(x) \sim \frac{1}{nx^{\frac{2}{n}}} \int^{\infty}_{0} \tau^{\frac{2-n}{n}} e^{-\tau} d\tau \) for \( 0 < n \leq 2 \). The leading order behavior of \( I_1(x) \) and \( I_2(x) \) is derived, demonstrating the application of Taylor series expansion and properties of the Laplace Transform in the integration process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace's Method for asymptotic analysis
  • Familiarity with integral calculus and properties of logarithmic functions
  • Knowledge of Taylor series expansion techniques
  • Basic understanding of the Gamma function and its applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Laplace's Method in different contexts, such as \( I(x) = \int_{a}^{b} f(t)e^{-xg(t)}dt \)
  • Explore Taylor series expansions and their role in approximating functions
  • Learn about the properties and applications of the Gamma function in integral calculus
  • Investigate other asymptotic methods for integral evaluation, such as the saddle point method
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students engaged in advanced calculus, particularly those focusing on asymptotic analysis and integral evaluation techniques.

ra_forever8
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Consider the integral
\begin{equation}
I_n(x)=\int^{2}_{1} (log_{e}t) e^{-x(t-1)^{n}}dt
\end{equation}
Use Laplace's Method to show that
\begin{equation}
I_n(x) \sim \frac{1}{nx^\frac{2}{n}} \int^{\infty}_{0} \tau^{\frac{2-n}{n}} e^{-\tau} d\tau \end{equation}
as $x\rightarrow\infty$.
where $0<n\leq2$. Hence find the leading order behaviour of $I_{1}(x)$. and $I_{2}(x)$ as $x\rightarrow \infty$.
=>
Its really difficult question for me.
Here,
$g(t) = -(t-1)^{n}$ has the maximum at $t=0$
but $h(t)= log_{e}t$ at $t=0$
$h(0)=0$.
so I can not go any further. PLEASE HELP ME.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
grandy said:
Consider the integral
\begin{equation}
I_n(x)=\int^{2}_{1} (log_{e}t) e^{-x(t-1)^{n}}dt
\end{equation}
Use Laplace's Method to show that
\begin{equation}
I_n(x) \sim \frac{1}{nx^\frac{2}{n}} \int^{\infty}_{0} \tau^{\frac{2-n}{n}} e^{-\tau} d\tau \end{equation}
as $x\rightarrow\infty$.
where $0<n\leq2$. Hence find the leading order behaviour of $I_{1}(x)$. and $I_{2}(x)$ as $x\rightarrow \infty$.
=>
Its really difficult question for me.
Here,
$g(t) = -(t-1)^{n}$ has the maximum at $t=0$
but $h(t)= log_{e}t$ at $t=0$
$h(0)=0$.
so I can not go any further. PLEASE HELP ME.

First it is useful to write the integral in a more suitable form...

$\displaystyle I_{n} (x) = \int_{0}^{1} \ln (1 + t)\ e^{- x\ t^{n}}\ d t\ (9)$

The Laplace integration of an expression like...

$\displaystyle I(x) = \int_{a}^{b} f(t)\ e^{- x\ g(t)}\ dt\ (2)$

... consists in approximating (2) with an expression which is valid for 'large' x according with the following steps...

a) let's suppose that g(t) has a minimum in t= c, being c in [a,b]...

b) we expand in Taylor series f(t) and g(t) around t=c...

c) we extend the integration range in $(- \infty, + \infty)$ or in $[0, + \infty)$ if c=0 and try to use the properties of the Laplace Transform [that's why this procedure is called 'Laplace Integration'...]

Now we can procced taking into account that is $\displaystyle f(t) = \ln (1 + t) \sim t$, $\displaystyle g(t)= t^{n}$ which has a minimum in x=0...

$\displaystyle I_{n} (x) = \int_{0}^{1} \ln (1 + t)\ e^{- x\ t^{n}}\ d t \sim \frac{1}{n}\ \int_{0}^{\infty} \tau^{\frac{1}{n}-1}\ \ln (1 + \tau^{\frac{1}{n}})\ e^{- x\ \tau}\ d \tau\ \sim$

$\displaystyle \sim \frac{1}{n}\ \int_{0}^{\infty} \tau^{\frac{2}{n}-1}\ e^{- x\ \tau}\ d \tau = \frac{\Gamma (\frac{2}{n})}{n\ x^{\frac{2}{n}}}\ (3)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K