How Can Simple Functions Help Find Lower Bounds for Integrals?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ssd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bound
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 3K views
ssd
Messages
268
Reaction score
6
Looking for some positive valued simple functions which are less than (or equal to) the following two integrals (given in the following post).By simple I mean that they may not involve integrals or imaginary components or some infinite series. Again, the functions may not be as simple as f(x) =0.

Please find the integrals in the following post, as I could not fix the latex problem in this post.

Thanks for any idea.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The integrals as referred in the previous post are as follows:


[tex]1/ \int_{x}^{\infty}\frac {e^{-y}}{y}dy[/tex] , x>0

[tex]2/ \int_{x}^{\infty} y e^{-y}dy[/tex] , x>0
 
Last edited:
The second one can be integrated to (exactly) [tex]e^{-x}(1+x)[/tex].

In the first one you can replace the y in the denominator by [tex]e^y[/tex] which will give you an easy integral. It will be a pretty bad lower bound though.
 
Eighty said:
The second one can be integrated to (exactly) [tex]e^{-x}(1+x)[/tex].

In the first one you can replace the y in the denominator by [tex]e^y[/tex] which will give you an easy integral. It will be a pretty bad lower bound though.

Thank you very much, I missed the substitution in that.
EDIT: I also missed that it simply can also be done 'by parts'.

What I thought was to replace y in the denominator by [tex]e^y/2[/tex] or [tex]e^{y-1}[/tex] in the other problem.
Any better idea about the second?...EDIT: I mean the other, problem no.1.
 
Last edited:
Better how? It's an exact antiderivative. What do you want?

edit: You can edit your posts, you know. :) Click the EDIT button next to the QUOTE button.
 
Last edited:
Eighty said:
Better how? It's an exact antiderivative. What do you want?

edit: You can edit your posts, you know. :)
Sorry for the misunderstanding, by 'second' I meant the other problem.
Thanks again for the help though.
 
Last edited: