How can the Komar mass formula be simplified for a general static metric?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pervect
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on simplifying the Komar mass formula for a general static metric, specifically addressing the expression involving the Levi-Civita tensor and the covariant derivative of a timelike Killing vector. Participants explore the formulation of the integral as -\frac{1}{8 \pi} \int_S \epsilon^{abcd} \nabla_c \xi_d and its implications for integrating over surfaces. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in expressing the integral in component notation and relates the Komar integral to Gauss's law, particularly in the context of the Schwarzschild metric.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Komar mass formula
  • Familiarity with static metrics in general relativity
  • Knowledge of differential forms and integration techniques
  • Basic concepts of Killing vectors and covariant derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Komar mass formula in various metrics
  • Learn about the properties and applications of the Levi-Civita tensor
  • Explore integration techniques involving differential forms in general relativity
  • Investigate the relationship between the Komar mass and Gauss's law in physics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, mathematicians, and students studying general relativity, particularly those interested in the properties of static metrics and the computation of mass in curved spacetime.

pervect
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
10,483
Reaction score
1,636
I've been trying to express the Komar mass formula in component notation for a general static metric.

I'm finding that the expression for

[tex] \nabla_c \xi_d[/tex]

is reasonably simple, where [itex]\xi^{\mu}[/itex] is a timelike Killing vector, but the formula calls for

[tex] \epsilon_{abcd} \nabla^c \xi^d[/tex]

and this is very messy.

(We have to integrate the above two-form over some surface to get the mass and multiply by an appropriate constant).

Is it kosher to re-write the formula for the Komar mass as

[tex] -\frac{1}{8 \pi} \int_S \epsilon^{abcd} \nabla_c \xi_d[/tex]

and to do so, would I be expressing the surface to be integrated by one-forms rather than vectors?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I only know a little about integration with differential forms, so my comments may be well wide of the mark and/or not very useful.

Are you trying to do the integral, or are just trying to get a component expression under the integral sign?

I have a vague idea what

[tex] -\frac{1}{8 \pi} \int_S \epsilon_{abcd} \nabla^c \xi^d[/tex]

means, but I don't know what

[tex] -\frac{1}{8 \pi} \int_S \epsilon^{abcd} \nabla_c \xi_d[/tex]

means.

Could you leave things in the form

[tex] -\frac{1}{8 \pi} \int_S \epsilon_{abcd} g^{ec} g^{fd} \nabla_{e} \xi_{f}?[/tex]

Regards,
George
 
Last edited:
George Jones said:
I only know a little about integration with differential forms, so my comments may be well wide of the mark and/or not very useful.

Are you trying to do the integral, or are just trying to get a component expression under the integral sign?

I have a vague idea what

[tex] -\frac{1}{8 \pi} \int_S \epsilon_{abcd} \nabla^c \xi^d[/tex]

means, but I don't know what

[tex] -\frac{1}{8 \pi} \int_S \epsilon^{abcd} \nabla_c \xi_d[/tex]

means.

Could you leave things in the form

[tex] -\frac{1}{8 \pi} \int_S \epsilon_{abcd} g^{ec} g^{fd} \nabla_{e} \xi_{f}?[/tex]

Regards,
George
What I'm trying to do is to explain the Komar intergal conceptually, and relate it to Gauss's law.

The ideal explanation would be detailed enough to allow someone to compute the correct answer to the intergal (at least in a simple enough case), without knowing any more than advanced calculus (i.e. they wouldn't need to know about covariant derivatives or Killing vectors).

We can get rid of Killing vectors by insisting on a static space-time, i.e. we have metric coefficients that are not functions of time.

To actually carry out the intergal, for example in the Schwarzschild metric, I work by rote. We find that [itex]\nabla^a \xi^b[/itex] is equal to

[itex]m/r^2 dr \wedge dt[/itex]

Multiplying it by the Levi-Civita tensor essentally takes the dual, so we now have

[itex]m/r^2 \sqrt{g} d\theta \wedge d\phi[/itex]

Substituting sqrt(g) = r^2 |sin(theta)| gives us the intergal

[tex] \int_0^{2 \pi} \int_0^{2 \pi} (m/r^2) r^2 |sin(\theta)| d\theta d\phi[/tex]

which gives the right answer for the mass, modulo the sign issue.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K