How can the Maclaurin series for sin^2(x) be simplified?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 9K views
John112
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
since the maclaurin series for sin x is alternating in sign (EQ1) so when you square it to get sin[itex]^{2}[/itex](x) (EQ2) the (-1)[itex]^{n}[/itex] should become (-1)[itex]^{2n}[/itex] (EQ3) which can be simplified down to (EQ4), but when i checked that series at wolframalpha the series was still alternating like: Why is that? So when we square it do we ignore squaring the (-1)[itex]^{n}[/itex] and put that after we're done squaring the series?In the above post when I say EQ#, I'm referring to these equations
140jd7c.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
micromass said:
You seem to think that ##\left(\sum \alpha_n\right)^2 = \sum \alpha_n^2##. This is of course false. It's the same thing as saying that ##(x + y)^2 = x^2 + y^2##.
I can now see why sin[itex]^{2}[/itex](x) should be alternating, but how would I then simplify this algerbracially? how would I simplify ##\left(\sum \alpha_n\right)^2## ? Is using the half angle property for sin[itex]^{2}[/itex](x) my only method?
 
Last edited:
John112 said:
I can now see why sin[itex]^{2}[/itex](x) should be alternating, but how would I then simplify this algerbracially? how would I simplify ##\left(\sum \alpha_n\right)^2## ? Is using the half angle property for sin[itex]^{2}[/itex](x) my only method?
It's probably the easiest way to go.
 
John112 said:
I can now see why sin[itex]^{2}[/itex](x) should be alternating, but how would I then simplify this algerbracially? how would I simplify ##\left(\sum \alpha_n\right)^2## ? Is using the half angle property for sin[itex]^{2}[/itex](x) my only method?

The half-angle property is indeed the easiest way. But there also is a explicit way to multiply two series. This is called the Cauchy product: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_product So you can solve it with this too, but this is a lot more complicated.

Another way is to explicitely find the derivatives of ##\sin^2(x)## and see if you can find a pattern. But this is also not a very simple way to go.