How can the moment of inertia of an object be calculated on an arbitrary axis?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the moment of inertia of an object, particularly focusing on how to determine it about an arbitrary axis, including the implications of the choice of origin for the inertia tensor. Participants explore the relationship between the center of mass and the moment of inertia, as well as the use of the parallel axis theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the origin for calculating the inertia tensor must always be at the center of mass and discusses the limits of integration in this context.
  • Another participant suggests that the moment of inertia should be calculated about the pivot point for rotation, recommending the use of the parallel axis theorem to transition from the center of mass to the desired axis.
  • Some participants note that the inertia tensor is dependent on the choice of origin, and that calculating it directly at the center of mass can be complicated. They propose calculating it in a more convenient coordinate system first.
  • There is an offer to provide further assistance or examples from textbooks on how to transform the inertia tensor to the center of mass coordinate system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of centering the origin at the center of mass and the methods for calculating the moment of inertia about an arbitrary axis. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing approaches presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity involved in calculating the inertia tensor and the potential need for additional resources or examples to clarify the process.

TheCanadian
Messages
361
Reaction score
13
This seems to be a crucial detail that I just glossed over, but when finding the inertia tensor of an object, is the origin always situated at the object centre of mass?

For example: In the link (http://hepweb.ucsd.edu/ph110b/110b_notes/node26.html ), is it necessary to do the integral from -s/2 to s/2 in each dimension as opposed to 0 to s if finding the inertia through the CoM?

Also, how exactly can one find the moment of inertia of an object on an arbitrary axis? Referring back to the link, if one wanted to find the moment of inertia on an axis making 30 degrees with the horizontal (but still running through the CoM), how exactly could the inertia tensor be transformed to do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The moment of inertia that you need is the one about the pivot point - the point about which the object is rotated. It is usually convenient to calculate this by taking the momen of inertia about the center of mass and use the parallel axis theorem to move to the point you want.
 
Your moment of inertia tensor is only true for where you center your origin. In most cases centering your coordinate system at the center of mass and calculating the tensor from there is complicated. The usual method for these problems is first calculating your inertia tensor in a "convenient" coordinate system (usually at the base of your solid) and then performing a simple matrix operation on your tensor to "move it" into the center of mass coordinate system. If you'd like me to show you how to do so I can, although most textbooks on the subject will have an example on it as well.
 
Mercy said:
Your moment of inertia tensor is only true for where you center your origin. In most cases centering your coordinate system at the center of mass and calculating the tensor from there is complicated. The usual method for these problems is first calculating your inertia tensor in a "convenient" coordinate system (usually at the base of your solid) and then performing a simple matrix operation on your tensor to "move it" into the center of mass coordinate system. If you'd like me to show you how to do so I can, although most textbooks on the subject will have an example on it as well.

I think I got it. Although I would be happy to read any material you might have.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K