How can the numerical value of the infinite Zeta Function sum be found?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the numerical value of the infinite sum involving the Riemann zeta function, specifically \(\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} (\zeta(-k))\). The subject area includes concepts related to series, special functions, and Bernoulli numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the zeta function and Bernoulli numbers, with some suggesting identities and transformations related to the series. Questions arise regarding the correctness of the original sum and implications of the terms involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and corrections to earlier posts. There is an exploration of various interpretations of the sum, and some participants are questioning the implications of the terms in the series.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of potential inaccuracies in the formulation of the original sum, and participants are encouraged to clarify their expressions to ensure a shared understanding of the problem being addressed.

seanhbailey
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the numerical value of [tex]\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} (\zeta(-k))[/tex]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea how to get a numerical value for this sum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sum [tex]\sum_k=0^\infty (\zeta(1-2k))[/tex] is equal to [tex]\sum_k=0^\infty (-B_{2k}\2k)[/tex]. I hope this helps. Thanks
 
I forgot to mention that B represents the Bernoulli numbers.
 
I think that

[tex]\zeta(1 - 2k)[/tex] = [tex]\frac{(-1)^{2k-1} B_{2k}}{2k}[/tex].

At least, that's what's in one of my books. Also, is that first sum correct? It looks like you're supposed to use the identity

[tex]\frac{x}{e^x - 1} = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{B_nx^n}{n!}[/tex]

but you need another k in the sum's denominator.

Petek
 
Thank you for helping. Sorry about the first sum; I typed it in wrong.
 
Because of the 1/k in the denominator, does this imply that [tex]\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} (\zeta(-k))[/tex] has no sum?
 
I found that zeta(-k) is equal to B(n)/(((-1)^(n+1))*n), where B(n) is the Bernoulli numbers, implying that [tex]\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} (\zeta(-k))[/tex] is equal to ln(2)*[tex]\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} (B(n))[/tex]. Sorry about the formating.
 
To make sure that we're solving the same problem, please post the sum that you're trying to evaluate (since one of your posts stated that the sum in your original post was inaccurate). Thanks!

Petek
 
The original sum I was trying to evaluate was [tex]\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} (\zeta(-k))[/tex].
 
  • #10
[tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} 1/n^s[/tex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K