How can the proof by contrapositive be used to show that x^2<x implies x<1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kathrynag
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around using proof by contrapositive to demonstrate that if \( x^2 < x \), then \( x < 1 \). Participants are exploring the logical structure of the proof and the implications of their assumptions regarding the values of \( x \).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to establish the proof by assuming \( x > 1 \) and showing that \( x^2 > x \). Others question the validity of certain steps and the implications of the assumptions made, particularly regarding the equality \( x^2 = x \cdot x \) and its relevance to the proof.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's reasoning and clarifying the logical steps involved in the proof. There is recognition of the need to correctly handle negations and assumptions, particularly regarding the conditions under which the original inequality holds.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the inequality may not hold for all values of \( x \), particularly when \( x \) is negative. There is also mention of the necessity to assume \( x > 0 \) for the proof to be valid.

kathrynag
Messages
595
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



x^2<x, then x<1

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


We will use a proof by contrapositive.
We assume x>1 and we want to show x^2>x.
Let x be greater than 1 and let x^2=x*x.
If x^2=x*x, then x*x>x. Therefore, x^2>x.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not quite, your contrapositive is correct and your first step assuming x > 1 is correct. But then you said:

kathrynag said:
Let x be greater than 1 and let x^2=x*x.
If x^2=x*x, then x*x>x. Therefore, x^2>x.

Firstly x^2 = x*x is just taken for granted so you don't need to put it in. Secondly, why does x^2=x*x imply x*x > x ?

All we know is:
x > 1
Then multiplying both sides by x we get:
x*x > 1*x
so then
x^2 > x

We can also prove this without the contrapositive.
 
Last edited:
kidmode01 said:
Not quite, your contrapositive is correct and your first step assuming x > 1 is correct. But then you said:



Firstly x^2 = x*x is just taken for granted so you don't need to put it in. Secondly, why does x^2=x*x imply x*x > x ?

All we know is:
x > 1
Then multiplying both sides by x we get:
x*x > 1*x
so then
x^2 > x

.

So, is this all I would have to do - the multiplying by x?
 
Think about it for a little while. Every step has to follow logically from the previous and all we had to work with was a single assumption. Search the forum for similar inequality proofs or do a Google search on introduction to proofs. If you have a textbook with a section on proofs and the different kinds, that would also help looking at.
 
kathrynag said:

Homework Statement



x^2<x, then x<1

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


We will use a proof by contrapositive.
We assume x>1 and we want to show x^2>x.
Let x be greater than 1 and let x^2=x*x.
If x^2=x*x, then x*x>x. Therefore, x^2>x.
As kidmode pointed out, you can do this directly. You also need to assume that x > 0, because the inequality isn't true otherwise. E.g., if x = -1/2, x^2 = 1/4 > -1/2, and if x = -2, x^2 = 4 > -2.

Start by assuming x > 0 and that x^2 < x.
Then x^2 - x < 0.
Now factor the left side and determine which values of x make it true.
 
Whoops. I wrote it down but I didn't add it, thanks Mark44.
 
I hate to add a complication but the negation of "x< 1" is NOT "x> 1".
 
Whoops again.

~(x<1) = (x >= 1)

Just put a line underneath all the inequalities in your contrapositive proof lol.
You'll have to fix the negation of the right side of "if" statement.
You'll end up proving:

x^2 >= x

Thanks HallsofIvy
 
Well, I'm supposed to prove using the contrapositive.
 
  • #10
"P implies Q" and "Not Q implies Not P" are logically equivalent. Constructing a truth table will show that the truth values of both statements are the same. So proving the statement is true or it's contrapositive is true are equivalent.
 
  • #11
kathrynag said:
Well, I'm supposed to prove using the contrapositive.
That wasn't clear to me from your first post "We will use a proof by contrapositive."

I interpreted that to mean that this was the direction you had decided to go, not one that was mandated in the problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K