How Can the Speed of Sound Help Determine Room Temperature?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating room temperature using the speed of sound and given parameters such as frequency and resonant length in an open-closed air column context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the speed of sound and subsequently the temperature but questions the validity of their result. Participants question the use of the resonant length in the calculations and clarify the relationship between resonant length and wavelength.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's calculations, providing clarifications and questioning assumptions made in the application of formulas. There is a focus on ensuring correct interpretation of the relationships between the variables involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a follow-up experiment related to the topic, indicating that the original poster is building on prior work. The discussion highlights potential confusion regarding the definitions of resonant length and wavelength.

SelenaT
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the room temperature by using the speed of sound formula and using the given values.

Known Data:
Frequency = 480 Hz
2nd Resonant length = 54cm or 0.54m

Homework Equations


v = 331 + (0.60)T
T = (v - 331)/0.60

v = fλ

(Open-Closed air column)
L = (3/4)λ

The Attempt at a Solution



(1) v = fλ
= 480Hz (0.53m)
= 254.4m/s

(2) T = (254.4m/s) - 331 / 0.60
= -127.6 degrees celsius[/B]

I highly doubt the temperature is this low. I realized that I used the wavelength as the resonant length so, I decided to solve for λ using the resonant length. I did the same process again but using the calculated λ but it didnt work either.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand how you got 0.53m. You don't seem to have used the ##L=(3/4)\lambda## formula.
 
haruspex said:
I don't understand how you got 0.53m. You don't seem to have used the ##L=(3/4)\lambda## formula.

Sorry, forgot to give a little context. I will remember next time.

This is a follow up question for an experiment that I did. Using an open-closed air column, I found that the second resonant length was 0.53m
 
SelenaT said:
Sorry, forgot to give a little context. I will remember next time.

This is a follow up question for an experiment that I did. Using an open-closed air column, I found that the second resonant length was 0.53m
OK, but that's L, not ##\lambda##. You plugged that value into your ##v=f\lambda## formula.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K