How can the telescopes take photos of distant galaxies?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the phenomenon of capturing images of distant galaxies and nebulae without the obstruction of nearby stars. Participants clarify that while foreground stars are often present in such images, they are typically faint and not easily visible unless they are exceptionally large and bright. The vastness of space contributes to the rarity of light rays from distant objects intersecting with nearby stars. Additionally, most observable galaxies lie outside the galactic plane, where the density of stars is lower, further reducing the likelihood of foreground star interference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of astrophysics concepts, particularly regarding light propagation in space.
  • Familiarity with astronomical imaging techniques and equipment.
  • Knowledge of the Milky Way's structure and star distribution.
  • Basic comprehension of nebulae and galaxy characteristics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the techniques used in astronomical imaging, such as long-exposure photography.
  • Explore the properties of nebulae and their visibility in different wavelengths.
  • Learn about the distribution of stars in the Milky Way and intergalactic space.
  • Investigate the impact of light pollution on astronomical observations.
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, astrophysicists, photographers interested in astrophotography, and educators teaching about celestial imaging and the structure of the universe.

Prog47
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
So how can the photos of distant galaxies have no nearer stars in front of them? Or photos of nebulae?
I feel like there are so many stars.that it would be impossible to take a photo of a distant object without a star in front of the photo blocking the way. Or is it luck that there are no stars between here and the photos they took?
What about photos of the deep space? Why is there no close star that is too close and takes up the shot in front of the millions of stars in the photo?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The simple answer is space is really really really big compared to the matter it contains, a quick search of sites such as http://astro.physics.uiowa.edu/~www/research/interstellar_medium.html and http://www.its.caltech.edu/~kamion/Ay126/SterlLectures.pdf for example will give some perspective.
 
Prog47 said:
So how can the photos of distant galaxies have no nearer stars in front of them? Or photos of nebulae?

They often do. But individual stars are essentially impossible to see unless they are VERY large and VERY bright. Such stars only form a small percentage of the stars in the Milky Way. Nebulas are also very difficult to see unless they are very close or very large and bright.

In addition, stars are really, really small compared to the ginormous distance between them. At a distance of one light year, a star with the same diameter as the Sun is only 0.0085 degrees across. At 4 light years, just about the distance to the nearest star, it would only be 0.002 degrees across. The chances that a ray of light leaves a source and impacts a star is extremely small.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Prog47
Most observable galaxies lay outside the galactic plane where most stars in the MW reside. Intergalactic space is mostly devoid of stars.
 
Prog47 said:
So how can the photos of distant galaxies have no nearer stars in front of them? Or photos of nebulae?

you are working from a very poor assumption

Drakkith said:
They often do

indeed ... VERY often do ... there would be very few photos of objects internal or external to
the Milky Way that don't show foreground stars

Drakkith said:
But individual stars are essentially impossible to see unless they are VERY large and VERY bright.

sorry, have to strongly disagree with that... they will be of all sorts of sizes and luminosities eg

opo0833a.jpg


ALL the stars in that image ( other than a tiny few very bright stars in that "larger galaxy) are foreground stars that are within the Milky WayDave
 
davenn said:
sorry, have to strongly disagree with that... they will be of all sorts of sizes and luminosities eg

I'll tentatively agree and try to remember to look up more info on this. :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K