How can the Universe be infinite and yet have a finite age?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the universe being infinite while having a finite age. Participants explore theoretical implications, mathematical interpretations, and the nature of infinities in physics, including their relevance to cosmological models and singularities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the universe could have started off infinite, but the true nature of its infinity remains uncertain.
  • Others argue that while the observable universe has a finite age and size, the universe beyond what we can observe is unknown.
  • One participant questions the interpretation of infinities in physics, suggesting that infinities in equations often indicate a problem, as seen with singularities in general relativity.
  • Another participant discusses the flat local geometry confirmed by observations and how this leads to a model of a spatially infinite universe, questioning why this infinity is not seen as problematic.
  • Some participants highlight that infinite density is considered unphysical, as it implies a volume of zero, which contradicts the existence of finite mass in black holes.
  • There are discussions about the mathematical concept of infinity, with some participants noting that "infinite" can mean "unbounded" in cosmology, and questioning how this relates to physical reality.
  • One participant raises Zeno's paradox to illustrate the complexities of discussing infinity in physics, contrasting mathematical abstraction with physical reality.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the implications of infinity in cosmology, with no consensus reached on whether the universe is finite or infinite, or on the nature of infinities in physical theories.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of infinity, the unresolved nature of singularities, and the challenges of relating mathematical concepts to physical realities.

  • #61
timmdeeg said:
Is that, "topology ##S^n## plus constant curvature", restricted to a FRW universe or generally to a universe which obeys the cosmological principle?

It's restricted to a spacetime that has spatial topology ##S^n## and constant spatial curvature. :wink: Such spacetimes are a subset of FRW spacetimes or spacetimes that obey the cosmological principle (since there are other topologies besides ##S^n## that allow constant spatial curvature).
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #62
Ibix said:
Point of pedantry - an octopus at least has a digestive tract, so is topologically a torus (or possibly something more complex if it has something like gills as well - I'm no marine biologist) since it effectively has a hole right through it. A stuffed toy octopus, though, lacking such biological messiness, would be topologically a sphere.
Ah, yes, you're right. I didn't realize it had a full digestive tract. I misremembered.
 
  • #63
If the universe does indeed bounce in between cycles of beginning and ending, then it can be considered infinite, with a finite "time" in between each cycle. Conceptually, this makes sense, more so than one universe having a single beginning and end, and nothing else existing after that one cycle. With so many possible combinations with particles at each beginning, each new cycle can be different than prior.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
8K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K