How Can the Work-Energy Theorem Be Applied to Calculate Block Speed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dsptl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying the work-energy theorem to determine the speed of a block in a system of blocks released from rest on a frictionless surface. Participants are exploring the relationship between potential and kinetic energy in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate acceleration and final speed using kinematic equations but expresses uncertainty about using the work-energy theorem. Some participants suggest using conservation of energy principles, while others inquire about how to account for multiple blocks and their varying heights.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing different methods to approach the problem, including conservation of energy and the work-energy theorem. There is a recognition of the need to consider the potential energy of each block and how to combine them, but no consensus has been reached on a specific method or solution.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of information regarding the heights of the blocks, which is impacting the ability to apply energy conservation principles fully. The original poster is also under the impression that specific expressions or equations are needed to proceed.

dsptl
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Speed Problem (Please Help!)

* A system of blocks is released from the rest. the speed of 10kg block just before it hits the ground the ground. The surface is frictionless.


http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/6199/24722704da3.jpg


Attempt:

I hv donw this way, but I am suppose to use work-kinetic energy theoreom or something to find the answer, which i hv no clue abt it...thought u guys would help me



first i found acceleration: a = g(M -m1sin45 - m2sin45)/(M+m1+m2) = 4.31 m2/s2

then used vf2 = vi2 +2ax = 0 + 2(4.31)(5) = 42.23m2/s2

and vf = 6.5m/s

but i need get this answer by Work-Kinetic theorem or something...Please HElp

Thanks in advacne
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Use conservation of energy. Write an expression for the total energy just before things start moving. Then write an expression for the total energy when the block hits the ground.
 


Redbelly98 said:
Use conservation of energy. Write an expression for the total energy just before things start moving. Then write an expression for the total energy when the block hits the ground.

our professor slightly went over it...can u please just write the expression, I can work tht out

Thanks a lot for helping
 


The exact equations should be in your textbook. There is (gravitational) potential energy and kinetic energy to account for.
 


Redbelly98 said:
The exact equations should be in your textbook. There is (gravitational) potential energy and kinetic energy to account for.

but there r 3 blocks how do i add them together for the energy?

starting: (m1+m2+m3)gh = .5(m1+m2+m3)v*v

but I the height is not given for all the blocks...
 


(m1+m2+m3)gh = .5(m1+m2+m3)v*v

There are two problems here.

1. The heights are all different. So you'll have to use h1, h2, and h3 for the heights of each block. Don't worry that the heights are not all given, it will work out in the end.

2. Potential and kinetic energies are not equal to each other. Instead, you add them together, to find the total energy of the 3 blocks.
 


Or you can simply find the acceleration of the system using Newton's laws, and then calculate the final velocity using equations of motion
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K