How Can Voltage Regulation Be Achieved for a Sensitive 390V Chiller?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of voltage regulation for a 390V chiller connected to a 400V AC substation, particularly when the voltage at the chiller terminals measures 410V. Participants explore potential solutions to regulate the voltage to the chiller's specified rating, considering the sensitivity of its electronics and the implications of voltage spikes and tolerances.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the chiller's voltage tolerance is fixed at 390V, suggesting that the 410V supply may be causing breakdowns.
  • Another participant questions whether the chiller's voltage tolerance is +/-10%, indicating that 410V could be within acceptable limits if so.
  • Several participants inquire about the nature of the breakdowns occurring in the chiller, asking for specifics on whether they involve motor windings or control electronics.
  • Concerns are raised about transient voltage spikes potentially affecting the chiller, especially given its location at the end of a transmission line.
  • One participant suggests that a tap change on the substation transformer could lower the voltage, but acknowledges that this may not be an option.
  • Another participant proposes using devices such as Constant Voltage Transformers (CVT) or Automatic Voltage Regulators (AVR) to manage voltage levels, while also noting the costs and limitations associated with these solutions.
  • There is a suggestion to measure voltage drops during chiller startup to better understand the situation, emphasizing the importance of empirical data over assumptions.
  • One participant emphasizes the need for a thorough investigation into what specifically is failing in the chiller to guide the selection of an appropriate solution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the voltage tolerance of the chiller and the implications of the observed voltage levels. While some believe that the voltage is too high for the chiller, others argue that it may be within acceptable limits. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact cause of the failures and the best approach to voltage regulation.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for precise measurements and investigations into the chiller's performance and specifications, as assumptions about voltage tolerances and causes of failure may not accurately reflect the situation.

Ivan001
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I have a problem with chiller. The chiller is connected on 400V AC (+-10%) substation. But, at the end of transmission line, on my chiller terminals, I have 410V, my chiller has Un=390V, so the chiller has often breakdown, probably the electronics are so sensitive...do you have any idea, how I can reuglate this voltage to 390V? The classic transformer sounds like not good idea, do you have any idea or you think that transformer 410/390V should be enough?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Is the chiller line voltage tolerance also +/-10%. If so, 410V is within specification.
390V +/-10% is a range of 451 to 429 volts.

What sort of breakdown? Motor winding failure, or a failure of control electronics?

What is the chiller KVA and/or full load current rating?
How far is the chiller from the substation?
Have you measured how low the line voltage dips during a chiller startup?

If the problem is caused by marginally high line voltage, and the substation transformer has variable taps (most larger ones do; often in several 2.5% increments) the easiest thing to do may be to switch the substation transformer tap changer to one setting lower. -2.5% of 410V is 399.8V.
Note: Transformer must be de-energized. A qualified electrician must perform this adjustment.

However, my suspicion is something other than line voltage alone is implicated.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Asymptotic said:
Is the chiller line voltage tolerance also +/-10%. If so, 410V is within specification.
390V +/-10% is a range of 451 to 429 volts.

What sort of breakdown? Motor winding failure, or a failure of control electronics?

What is the chiller KVA and/or full load current rating?
How far is the chiller from the substation?
Have you measured how low the line voltage dips during a chiller startup?

If the problem is caused by marginally high line voltage, and the substation transformer has variable taps (most larger ones do; often in several 2.5% increments) the easiest thing to do may be to switch the substation transformer tap changer to one setting lower. -2.5% of 410V is 399.8V.
Note: Transformer must be de-energized. A qualified electrician must perform this adjustment.

However, my suspicion is something other than line voltage alone is implicated.

Thanks for reply. The chiller doesn't have tollerance +-10%, his voltage is fixed to 390V. Chiller has 15kVA. The substation is near, so I think that voltage drop isn't enough for chiller. The tap change in substation isn't allowed. Is there any possibilities to regulate this voltage with some device?
 
If the chiller has any US, Canadian, or European safety certifications, then the +/-10% (ok +6% for some European standards) voltage range is implied. Also true if it is a good design. No one should (does?) design this sort of equipment without some tolerance for input voltage variations, since that is what you will find at real world installations. How designers communicate this on the ratings label can be confusing, or non-existent.
I suspect that the issue is more likely transient voltage spikes, particularly since you said it was at the end of a transmission line. Perhaps you could connect a monitor to it?
Insulation failures (arcs) are more often due to high voltage transients. Overheating is more common with slightly high voltages.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and Asymptotic
DaveE said:
If the chiller has any US, Canadian, or European safety certifications, then the +/-10% (ok +6% for some European standards) voltage range is implied. Also true if it is a good design. No one should (does?) design this sort of equipment without some tolerance for input voltage variations, since that is what you will find at real world installations. How designers communicate this on the ratings label can be confusing, or non-existent.
I suspect that the issue is more likely transient voltage spikes, particularly since you said it was at the end of a transmission line. Perhaps you could connect a monitor to it?
Insulation failures (arcs) are more often due to high voltage transients. Overheating is more common with slightly high voltages.
Any idea how to regulate this spikes or slighty high voltages?
 
Ivan001 said:
Thanks for reply. The chiller doesn't have tollerance +-10%, his voltage is fixed to 390V. Chiller has 15kVA. The substation is near, so I think that voltage drop isn't enough for chiller. The tap change in substation isn't allowed. Is there any possibilities to regulate this voltage with some device?
@DaveE is right. Everything has a tolerance . If it isn't on the chiller data plate it should be in the operations manual, and at worst the manufacturer can be called for this information.

A more thorough investigation is necessary. "I think that voltage drop isn't enough" is similar to answers I've received from less experienced colleagues, and I'll tell you what I've told them, "Stop thinking, measure!".

Voltage sag during start-up probably has nothing to do with these failures (especially in this case: 25 KVA isn't a very large chiller, and ought not be capable of causing sags large enough to matter) but substituting preconceived ideas of what is happening in place of close observation and actual measurement doesn't further the troubleshooting process. One tends to either chase ghosts down one garden path, or ignore fruitful lines of inquiry on another by thinking "it must be X", when in actuality "X" has little or nothing to do with the failure.

But to answer your question, yes, it is possible to regulate and condition line voltage.
Search on CVT (Constant Voltage Transformer) and AVR (Automatic Voltage Regulator). There are several ways to go about automatic voltage regulation, and Staco, one of the manufacturers that specialize in this equipment, has a good overview. Follow the 'Product Brochure|Application and Engineering Data' menu path at:
http://www.stacoenergy.com/products...-mechanical/stacoavr#literature_documentation

All approaches to AVR are relatively costly, come with disadvantages of their own, and don't solve all voltage-related problems. If 410V is indeed too high for this 390V rated chiller and overvoltage is causing the failures, then a properly rated buck-boost transformer wired to "buck" would be one of the less expensive fixes.

What is failing (control electronics? power electronics? motor windings?) and how (overheating? winding insulation punch-through?). Answering these questions will point you towards a solution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K