How Can We Accurately Convert MPG to Vehicle Efficiency?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenge of accurately converting miles per gallon (MPG) into a measure of vehicle efficiency, focusing on the relationship between fuel consumption and the work done by the vehicle. Participants explore various factors that influence this conversion, including vehicle speed, resistance forces, and engine thermodynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the difficulty in determining vehicle efficiency based solely on MPG and expresses a desire for a precise percentage of work done versus energy lost.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the efficiency calculation depends on the vehicle's operational conditions, such as whether it is stationary or moving, and suggests that different scenarios yield different results.
  • A participant proposes using a specific speed (70 mph) and MPG (20 mpg) as a basis for calculations but is uncertain about the methodology.
  • One response outlines a method to calculate the power required to overcome rolling and air resistance, suggesting that this can be compared to the energy input from fuel to determine efficiency.
  • A participant mentions that aerodynamic drag significantly impacts MPG and should be considered in the calculations.
  • Another participant argues that the pursuit of a single efficiency metric may be futile, as it would only apply under specific conditions and that engine thermodynamic efficiency remains relatively constant while MPG can vary widely.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility and usefulness of converting MPG to vehicle efficiency. While some provide methods for calculation, others question the validity of obtaining a single efficiency measure due to varying conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence on specific operational conditions and the limitations of using a single data point for efficiency calculations. There are unresolved aspects regarding the assumptions made in the calculations and the variability of MPG under different driving conditions.

ISX
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
This seems pretty hard to do but is there a way to figure out how efficient a vehicle is based on fuel used and MPG? I know there's about 1/3 gone to exhaust 1/3 through radiator and 1/3 is work but I want to get an exact percentage on the work part. So it would be 33% if it was like what I just stated. I know weights of the vehicles, everything. I want to factor in as much as possible so I can get the closest possible percent. Thanks for any help!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Well you need to decide what you want to accomplish by this. The answer varies hugely depending on what the vehicle is doing at the time you choose to take your measurements.

When the vehicle isn't moving, your MPG is obviously zero, and your efficiency (in terms of moving the vehicle) will be zero, but some work is still being done for anciliaries which you may or may not choose to account for.

When the vehicle is moving at full pelt, the equation is pretty easy; just look at the power needed to maintain terminal velocity, the energy going in as fuel, and; well there's your answer.

At part load or part throttle you can do the same consideration under steady state, constant conditions. For transients you're pretty buggered.

What are you trying to do?
 
Yeah that will be good enough. Like at 70mph I get 20mpg so I could base it all off that, just don't know how to do it..
 
Ok.

To work out the power required to propel the car at 70mph you need to calculate the power required to overcome rolling resistance and air resistance. Add a bit for drivetrain efficiencies if you want to take care of those, and ancilliaries. Do all this on a power (ie. watts per second) basis.

To work out the energy going in as fuel, first calculate the fuel flow rate (i.e. what's 20mpg in terms of litres per minute of fuel at 70mph). Then multiply this by the calorific value of the fuel.

Your efficiency is the ratio of the two.
 
also aero drag is major player in MPG..
 
To me this seems like a useless pursuit: any answer you get would only be a single data point, applying only to a specific set of conditions. The thermo eff of a car engine is nearly constant while the mpg varies wildly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
14K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K