How Can We Calculate Relativistic Velocity for an Interstellar Journey?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter servo75
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativistic Velocity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating relativistic velocity for an interstellar journey involving constant acceleration and deceleration at 1g. Participants explore the implications of relativistic effects on velocity and distance traveled, particularly in the context of a spaceship's journey to a distant star.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a scenario where a spaceship accelerates at 1g and questions how to find the relativistic versions of the equations for velocity and distance, noting that classical equations suggest velocities could exceed c.
  • Another participant provides the world line equations for a uniformly accelerating particle, asserting that the velocity remains less than c, and offers expansions to recover Newtonian formulas for small proper time.
  • A clarification is made regarding the velocity formula, correcting an earlier misstatement about the relationship between distance and time.
  • One participant discusses the concept of inertial resistance and the perception of increasing mass as the spaceship accelerates, suggesting diminishing returns on energy expenditure.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the acceleration is in the instantaneous rest frame of the spaceship, not in the original fixed system, providing a formula for velocity and distance traveled under this assumption.
  • A participant raises a question about how travelers on the spaceship perceive their velocity relative to the original frame, particularly regarding the interpretation of distance and time as they approach relativistic speeds.
  • It is noted that if travelers use the original frame's mileposts, they may calculate a velocity greater than c, but this does not violate special relativity as the quantity is not considered a velocity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of relativistic effects and how to interpret velocity and distance in the context of the spaceship's journey. There is no consensus on the best approach to calculating these quantities or the implications of exceeding c in certain calculations.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations are noted regarding the assumptions made about frames of reference and the interpretation of velocity in relativistic contexts. The discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps and varying interpretations of the scenario presented.

servo75
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I saw the following scenario on an episode of Cosmos: An interstellar spaceship accelerates at 1g for the 1st half of a journey to a distant star and then decelerates at 1g for the 2nd half. So with constant acceleration, the velocity would go beyond c at some point, which is not possible. So how would one find the relativistic versions of

v(t)=at

and

d(t)=0.5at2

(assuming x0=v0= 0)

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The world line of a uniformly accelerating particle is given by

x = (c2/a) cosh(aτ/c)
t = (c/a) sinh(aτ/c)

where τ is the particle's proper time. The velocity is v = x/t = c tanh(aτ/c), which is always less than c.

For small τ we can expand the functions and recover the Newtonian formulas:
x ≈ (c2/a)(1 + ½(aτ/c)2 + ...) = c2/a + ½aτ2
t ≈ (c/a)(aτ/c + ... ) = τ
v ≈ c(aτ/c - ...) = aτ

(Note that these nice formulas displace the origin, and use x0 = c2/a)
 
The velocity is v = x/t = c tanh(aτ/c)
Sorry, should be v = dx/dt = (dx/dτ)/(dt/dτ) = (c sinh(aτ/c))/(cosh(aτ/c)) = c tanh(aτ/c)
 
See also http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/rocket.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If an agent in the initial rest frame expends energy to accelerate the traveler beyond C, he finds increasing (classically unexpected) inertial resistance, with diminishing returns as the traveler appears to get "heavier" as it accelerates.
 
1977ub, I believe you misread the question. We're not talking about the effect of an applied external force, presumably constant in the initial rest frame. This is a spaceship accelerating under its own thrust, constant in its own instantaneous rest frame.
 
Last edited:
This is a standard problem. The acceleration g is in the instantaneous rest system of the spaceship, not in the original fixed system.
For an acceleration g in the instantaneous rest system of the spaceship, the velocity is (with c=1)
[tex]v=\frac{gt}{\sqrt{1+g^2t^2}}=\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex].
The distance traveled is
[tex]x=\left(\sqrt{1+g^2t^2}-1\right)/g[/tex].
 
Last edited:
Bill_K said:
1977ub, I believe you misread the question. We're not talking about the effect of an applied external force, presumably constant in the initial rest frame. This is a spaceship accelerating under its own thrust, constant in its own instantaneous rest frame.

Actually I didn't finish my thought with that post because I couldn't figure out / remember certain things about the issue in the ship's perspective. It's pretty straightforward to decide the velocity of the ship from the perspective of the original frame, and issues which stand in the way of success of getting to c for an external agent.

For someone on the ship, how do they determine what is standing in the way of getting to c? How do they determine their rate wrt the original frame at any given moment?

If they trust / use the original frame's mileposts, which are encountered to be coming closer and closer together, will the decide that they must be > c wrt the original frame?
 
Last edited:
1977ub said:
If they trust / use the original frame's mileposts, which are encountered to be coming closer and closer together, will the decide that they must be > c wrt the original frame?
If they divide distance in the launch frame by their own proper time then they will indeed get a number larger than c. This is not a violation of SR because the specified quantity is not a velocity.
 
  • #10
DaleSpam said:
If they divide distance in the launch frame by their own proper time then they will indeed get a number larger than c. This is not a violation of SR because the specified quantity is not a velocity.

Ok Thanks that's what I thought. [everyone on the ship breaks out the champagne]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 200 ·
7
Replies
200
Views
14K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
70
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K