How can we determine the sum of roots in a quadratic equation with real roots?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the sum of roots in a quadratic equation derived from a quartic equation, specifically analyzing conditions under which the roots are real. Participants explore the implications of the product and sum of roots in relation to their signs and the existence of non-negative roots.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that for the quartic equation to have real roots, the corresponding quadratic must have at least one non-negative root, but they express uncertainty about the sum of the roots.
  • One participant proposes that if the product of the roots is positive, both roots must be either positive or negative, leading to implications for the sum of the roots.
  • Another participant questions whether it is possible for one root to be negative with a smaller magnitude, resulting in a positive sum and a negative product.
  • It is suggested that if the product of the roots is negative, then there must be one positive and one negative root, which would satisfy the conditions for having a non-negative root.
  • Participants discuss combining conditions from different cases to analyze the roots, considering unions and intersections of domains.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the product and sum of roots, particularly regarding the possibility of having one positive and one negative root. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on the relationships between the roots.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the importance of the discriminant being non-negative for the existence of real roots, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding the specific conditions under which the sum and product of roots can be analyzed.

DaalChawal
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
1631340569988.png

I am confused in (iia) and (iib).

If $x^4 +( \alpha - 1) x^2 + \alpha + 2 = 0$ has real roots that means $y^2 + ( \alpha -1) + \alpha + 2 =0 $ should have at least one non-negative root. This means product of roots of (2) can be greater or less than zero...But I'm not able to comment on sum of roots.

Help Please.
 

Attachments

  • 1631340496942.png
    1631340496942.png
    60.7 KB · Views: 138
Mathematics news on Phys.org
DaalChawal said:
View attachment 11330
I am confused in (iia) and (iib).

If $x^4 +( \alpha - 1) x^2 + \alpha + 2 = 0$ has real roots that means $y^2 + ( \alpha -1) + \alpha + 2 =0 $ should have at least one non-negative root. This means product of roots of (2) can be greater or less than zero...But I'm not able to comment on sum of roots.

Help Please.
Let's assume from here on that the discriminant is $\ge 0$. Otherwise there is no solution.

Now let's forget about roots that can be zero for a moment.
If the product of the roots is positive, then that means that either both roots are positive, or both roots are negative.
Otherwise the product is not positive.
So we can't tell yet if we have at least one positive root.
However, if there is at least one positive, then the other root must also be positive, so their sum must be positive.
And if both roots are negative, then their sum must be negative.
So the sum of the roots allows us to distinguish cases.
In short if $\text{Product of roots} >0 \text{ and } \text{Sum of roots} > 0$, then we have a non-negative root as desired.

If the product of the roots is negative, then that means there is one positive root and one negative root, so we have what we need.
In short if $\text{Product of roots} <0$, then we have a non-negative root as desired.

Now let's go back to roots that could be zero.
If at least one root is zero, then the product is zero as well, and we have a non-negative root as desired.
In short if $\text{Product of roots} =0$, then we have a non-negative root as desired.

In all other cases, we don't have a non-negative root.

Can we combine those 3 conditions into what we have in (iia) and (iib)?
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
if there is at least one positive, then the other root must also be positive, so their sum must be positive.
Isn't there a possibility that other root can be negative but of less magnitude so that sum becomes positive and product becomes negative?
 
We can combine for (iia) and (iib) we will take union of those domains and for whole (i) and (ii) we can take intersection
 
DaalChawal said:
Isn't there a possibility that other root can be negative but of less magnitude so that sum becomes positive and product becomes negative?
If both roots are negative, then the sum is negative.
So in your case we must have a root that is positive.
Then the product is indeed negative.

If the product is negative, then we don't need to look at the sum at all because one of the roots must be positive, so that we have a solution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K