How Can we Find the Escape velocity of a black hole

  • #1

Main Question or Discussion Point

How Can we Find the Escape velocity of a black hole.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Borg
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,871
2,271
How Can we Find the Escape velocity of a black hole.
Nothing can escape a black hole.
 
  • #3
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2019 Award
15,937
5,649
How Can we Find the Escape velocity of a black hole.
We KNOW the "escape velocity" of a black hole. It is the speed of light. Since nothing can travel at the speed of light, nothing with mass can escape from a black hole (so it isn't really an "escape" velocity) and even light can only maintain a position exactly at the event horizon because locally it is traveling outward at c and globally, it is being held in place by the gravity of the black hole.
 
  • #4
748
39
How Can we Find the Escape velocity of a black hole.
In a very rudimentary way, it's the escape velocity equation that can tell us something about the nature of black holes. If we take the escape velocity equation-
[tex]v_e=\sqrt{2Gm/r}[/tex]
establish that the escape velocity is the speed of light (c) then rearrange relative to r, you get the Schwarzschild radius which is the coordinate radius for the event horizon (where the escape v is the speed of light)-
[tex]R_s=\frac{2Gm}{c^2}[/tex]
For a better understanding, you might want to check out the Schwarzschild metric.
 
  • #5
1,316
104
We KNOW the "escape velocity" of a black hole. It is the speed of light. Since nothing can travel at the speed of light, nothing with mass can escape from a black hole (so it isn't really an "escape" velocity) and even light can only maintain a position exactly at the event horizon because locally it is traveling outward at c and globally, it is being held in place by the gravity of the black hole.
Yes if it's beyond Schwarzshild Radius
Score 1 - 0 for me :smile:
 
  • #6
How is possible for x-rays to be emitted from a black hole, but not light?
 
  • #7
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2019 Award
15,937
5,649
How is possible for x-rays to be emitted from a black hole, but not light?
Not sure what you are talking about. Nothing comes out of a black hole, including any kind of photons, visible light, X-rays, microwaves, whatever.

Perhaps you are thinking of the accretion disk, but it can emit any kind of electromagnetic radiation.
 
  • #8
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
11,408
738
As Phinds noted, all radiation emitted by a black hole originates external to the event horizon
 
  • #9
1,316
104
...Nothing comes out of a black hole, including any kind of photons, visible light, X-rays, microwaves...
Can I add a question here?

Visible light travels at ≈ 300 000 km/sec
X ray travels at 300 000 km/sec
Microwave travels at 300 000 km/sec
and...
Gravity travels/propagates at 300 000 km/sec
So nothing can escape black hole but Gravity? Because it looks like Gravity has the same characteristic as light.

Please don't answer this, if this question should belong to another thread. I'll post it there someday
 
  • #10
Based on this type of picture, I was guessing the x-rays were coming from the center. Doesn't look like they're coming from the disk.
490046a-f1.2.jpg
 
  • #11
1,316
104
...Perhaps you are thinking of the accretion disk...
The jets matter comes from the accretion disk, the circle with the blue color.

...all radiation emitted by a black hole originates external to the event horizon
And the accretion disk is beyond the event horizon.
 
  • #12
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
11,408
738
Black hole jets emanate from the poles due to magnetic confinement. They still originate in the accretion disk.
 
  • #13
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2019 Award
15,937
5,649
Can I add a question here?

Visible light travels at ≈ 300 000 km/sec
X ray travels at 300 000 km/sec
Microwave travels at 300 000 km/sec
and...
Gravity travels/propagates at 300 000 km/sec
So nothing can escape black hole but Gravity? Because it looks like Gravity has the same characteristic as light.

Please don't answer this, if this question should belong to another thread. I'll post it there someday
This is an easy point of confusion and you are certainly not alone in having it. The thing is, CHANGES in gravity propagate at c. The gravitational force itself propagates as it changes and develops but by the time a body, our sun for example, has formed, all the gravitational changes have propagated and the gravity field then exists unchanging. The same is true with a black hole. The gravitational field it exerts developed as it formed but now that it has formed, its gravitational field exists as is and does not need to propagate.

Should our sun magically (and against all laws of physics) suddenly cease to exist, the change in gravity would propagate at c, reaching the Earth 8 minutes later.
 
  • #14
1,316
104
Can I add a question here?
Please tell me if this question doesn't belong to this thread, I'll create a new thread.

Gravity curvature.jpg

No, it's not a light path.
Does C orbit the barrcenter of A1, B, C or C orbits the barrcentre of A2, B, C?
It's just that I was just thinking about this gravity thing. It propagates at the speed of light. Is it curved, too?
 
  • #15
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2019 Award
15,937
5,649
n-body orbits are around the common center of gravity of all bodies involved. Gets very messy.

It's better to start a new thread when you have a question that is a bit off-topic for the current thread.
 
  • #16
1,316
104
n-body orbits are around the common center of gravity of all bodies involved. Gets very messy.

It's better to start a new thread when you have a question that is a bit off-topic for the current thread.
Thanks, Phinds.
 
  • #17
748
39
Based on this type of picture, I was guessing the x-rays were coming from the center. Doesn't look like they're coming from the disk.
490046a-f1.2.jpg
One decent analogy I recall for black hole jets is to image pouring a jug of water into a sink, in this case, there's no problem and the water will swirl down the plug hole. Now imagine taking a fire hose and firing this into the sink; the plug hole is too small to accommodate all the water and as a result, water will shoot up the sides of the sink. This (along with magnetic field lines) is pretty much what is happening with black hole jets. As it's been established, black holes are very compact and when a lot of matter is falling in, not all of it will pass the event horizon and as a result, be ejected at the poles.
 
  • #18
1,316
104
...As it's been established, black holes are very compact and when a lot of matter is falling in, not all of it will pass the event horizon and as a result, be ejected at the poles.
Wow, you're sure?
Amazing :smile:
 
  • #19
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2019 Award
15,937
5,649
One decent analogy I recall for black hole jets is to image pouring a jug of water into a sink, in this case, there's no problem and the water will swirl down the plug hole. Now imagine taking a fire hose and firing this into the sink; the plug hole is too small to accommodate all the water and as a result, water will shoot up the sides of the sink. This (along with magnetic field lines) is pretty much what is happening with black hole jets. As it's been established, black holes are very compact and when a lot of matter is falling in, not all of it will pass the event horizon and as a result, be ejected at the poles.
Wow, you're sure?
Amazing :smile:
There can be so much matter coming toward a black hole, and at an angle so that it's all rotating and the bits get in each others way and the accretion disk heats up and through a process I don't understand, but one of our more knowledgeable members will be able to explain I'm sure, it gets to a point where its interaction with the magnetic field of a rotating black hole shoots jets of matter/plasma out perpendicular to the accretion disk such that it appears to be coming out of the poles of the black hole (but of course it isn't)
 
  • #20
1,316
104
...where its interaction with the magnetic field of a rotating black hole...
Rotating singularity?
I can imagine a rotating 3D object.
Cube, Prism, Pyramid. But it's hard to picture a rotatic sphere much less a rotating object with no size.
The singularity. It rotates?
 
  • #21
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2019 Award
15,937
5,649
Rotating singularity?
I can imagine a rotating 3D object.
Cube, Prism, Pyramid. But it's hard to picture a rotatic sphere much less a rotating object with no size.
The singularity. It rotates?
Black holes add mass from in-falling objects. The chances of any of this coming in on a straight approach are approximately zero, therefore the black hole gains angular momentum and rotates. You seem to believe that "singularity" means "point". It does not. It means "the place where our math models give unphysical results and we don't actually know WHAT the hell is going on and we need a better theory". Just Google "rotating black hole".
 
  • #22
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2019 Award
15,937
5,649
... it's hard to picture a rotatic sphere ...
Seriously? Have you never watched a basketball player spin a basketball on the end of his finger?
 
  • #23
1,316
104
Seriously? Have you never watched a basketball player spin a basketball on the end of his finger?
For a uniformed sphere.
If the sphere is uniformed, we can't draw or take a video of its motion.
Not like cube, or even cone. assuming we move it not by its vertical axis.
 
  • #24
1,316
104
And the relation with gravity...
Does a uniformed rotating sphere has effect on orbits?
Supposed A and B are rotating each other.
If A is a rotating cube, well, I might suspect it has effect in the orbits, although I can't do the math.
But if A is a uniformed sphere.
Will the orbits differs if A is rotating or static.
But I think this belong to other thread.
 
  • #25
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2019 Award
15,937
5,649
And the relation with gravity...
Does a uniformed rotating sphere has effect on orbits?
Supposed A and B are rotating each other.
If A is a rotating cube, well, I might suspect it has effect in the orbits, although I can't do the math.
But if A is a uniformed sphere.
Will the orbits differs if A is rotating or static.
But I think this belong to other thread.
It is irrelevant whether we can "see" the rotation, we can measure it. Google "frame dragging".
 

Related Threads on How Can we Find the Escape velocity of a black hole

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
21
Views
4K
Top