How can we generalize this proof to infinite dimensional vector spaces?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maybe_Memorie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that for any three linear operators A, B, and C mapping a vector space V to itself, the rank of the composition ABC is less than or equal to the rank of B, expressed as rk(ABC) ≤ rk(B). The proof utilizes the properties of image and kernel dimensions, specifically the relationships rk(A) = dimIm(A) and V = rk(A) + dimKer(A). The conclusion drawn is that the proof holds under the condition that V is finite-dimensional, as indicated by participants in the discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts such as rank, image, and kernel of linear operators.
  • Familiarity with the dimension theorem for vector spaces.
  • Knowledge of the properties of linear transformations and their compositions.
  • Experience with finite-dimensional vector spaces.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear transformations in infinite-dimensional vector spaces.
  • Explore the implications of the rank-nullity theorem in various contexts.
  • Investigate examples of linear operators and their ranks in finite-dimensional spaces.
  • Learn about the generalization of linear algebra concepts to infinite-dimensional settings.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on linear algebra, as well as researchers dealing with vector space theory and its applications in various fields.

Maybe_Memorie
Messages
346
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let V be a vector space. Show that for every three linear operators
A,B,C: V -> V, we have
rk(ABC) =< rk(B)

Homework Equations



V = rk(A) + dimKer(A)

rk(A) = dimIm(A)

The Attempt at a Solution



Im(ABC) = {ABC(v) | vEV}
= {AB(C(v)) | vEV}

So Im(ABC) is a subset of Im(AB)

So dimIm(ABC) =< dimIm(AB)

So rk(ABC) =< rk(AB)

Im(AB) = {A(B(w)) | wEV}

Ker(B) subset of ker(AB) because if Bx=0, then ABx = A0 = 0

By the dimension formula, this leads to rk(B) >= rk(AB)

So putting the two results together we get rk(ABC) =< rk(B)


Is this correct? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Maybe_Memorie! :smile:

Your proof seems correct! But it seems you'll need V to be finite dimensional for it to work.
 
micromass said:
Hi Maybe_Memorie! :smile:

Your proof seems correct! But it seems you'll need V to be finite dimensional for it to work.

We've only dealt with finite dimensional vector spaces.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K