How Can We Harness the Energy from Naica Mine's Hot Water?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around potential methods to harness energy from the hot water discarded from the Naica mine in Chihuahua, Mexico, which has a temperature of 75°C (167°F). Participants explore various theoretical applications and energy conversion techniques, including the Stirling cycle, Rankine cycle, and thermoelectric devices, while considering the practical challenges involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using the hot water as a direct source of hot water, while another questions the feasibility of other applications due to the ambient temperature being relatively close to the water temperature.
  • There is a proposal to utilize the Stirling cycle, but concerns are raised about the temperature difference needed to generate useful work.
  • Another participant mentions the possibility of using a shallow well to access cooler water, which could create a more favorable temperature differential for energy conversion.
  • Discussion includes the potential of using a Peltier junction device, despite its inefficiency, and references advancements in thermoelectric generators.
  • A participant introduces the idea of a small-scale geothermal plant and suggests the Rankine cycle as a potentially better alternative to the Stirling engine, although sourcing components may be challenging.
  • Concerns are raised about the purity of the water and its suitability for direct domestic use, as well as the possibility of using the heat for pre-heating a working fluid in other systems.
  • Innovative concepts such as thermoacoustic generators are mentioned, which could utilize the heat difference without moving parts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of ideas and concerns, with no clear consensus on the best method to harness the energy from the hot water. Multiple competing views on the feasibility and efficiency of various energy conversion methods remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations regarding the temperature differential required for effective energy conversion and the challenges of transporting the hot water. There are also concerns about the purity of the water and its implications for direct use.

mario mata
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
hot water! (energy conversion)

Hello colleagues I´m new here and I'm from delicias, Chihuahua, Mexico and the reason of my post is that I want to do something with the water that is discarded of the mine of Naica, Chihuahua because this water from the mine has a lot of energy, I mean the water is 75°C! (167°F). I would like to help me with ideas to use that energy.:shy:
if you want to meet the mine go ahead http://www.naica.com.mx/
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


Wow those caves look amazing.

Well the immediate thoughts are to use it as a source of hot water, how close do you live?

Aside from that, there's not much else it's good for really.
 


I'm live very close to it, 30 min and my partner live in that small town, he is physicist too.
I was wondering if i can use somehow the Stirling cycle?? do you thing is a good idea...
 


mario mata said:
I'm live very close to it, 30 min and my partner live in that small town, he is physicist too.
I was wondering if i can use somehow the Stirling cycle?? do you thing is a good idea...

You need a good temperature difference to get any useful work out of it.

What is the ambient temperature?
 


well, the ambient temperature is around of 25°C to 38°C almost always, at nights the temperature downs to 15°C but i think that energy is completely wasted
 


Well you haven't got a very good temperature difference to do much more than use it as a hot water source. Although how you'd transport it over the distance I don't know.
 


If a shallow well (50 to 100 feet or so) would reach the water table there, then you could get 50-60 degree water. That delta might be enough to make decent use of a sterling engine... But, the energy required to get the water up from the shallow well may be more than you could harness from the sterling engine... Not sure, I'm not an expert on sterling engines...
 


mp3car said:
If a shallow well (50 to 100 feet or so) would reach the water table there, then you could get 50-60 degree water. That delta might be enough to make decent use of a sterling engine... But, the energy required to get the water up from the shallow well may be more than you could harness from the sterling engine... Not sure, I'm not an expert on sterling engines...

I don't think the temperature difference is enough to operate a stirling engine.
 


yeah, as I said, I'm not an expert on sterling engines, it was just a thought... but now that i think about it, the one sterling engine i have seen in person was the single piston type that used an alcohol burner, significantly hotter than 160F... but i have seen novelty versions sold, like one that sits on top of a computer monitor (CRT presumable) and will spin. http://www.ltd-stirling.de/id46.htm

Another thought is using a peltier junction device?? But they are very inefficient. But I seem to remember a recent advancement with them (just in the lab for now, i think)...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoelectric_generator
 
  • #10


This is a pretty cool idea, it would basically be a small-scale geothermal plant operating at a somewhat lower temperature.

Based on what you're looking to do with the energy, there are a few methods for utilizing it. To convert to mechanical energy, a stirling engine might be a solution but a better one could be a rankine cycle system which utilizes a working fluid other than water (maybe a refrigerant for example). Sourcing the turbine and pump might be difficult however. It might also be possible to combine a refrigeration system with a standard steam-based rankine system, although that may be getting too complex.

If you want to convert to electrical energy, the most direct (simplest) solution would probably be a peltier stack. Yes it would be inefficient, but efficiency isn't a huge concern since you're harvesting from an abundance of heat. The other options would basically involve attaching a generator to the mechanical energy options.

If this is the cave system I'm thinking of, isn't the water being pumped out of the mine and once the pumps turn off the water will stop flowing? Does water flow out of the mine naturally?
 
  • #11


Interesting case. Too deep to siphon, too impure to use directly for domestic hot water. Since it has to be pumped out anyhow, there may be geothermal uses, but I suspect it's best applied to pre-heat a working fluid going to some other superheater (e.g. solar). I assume it's presently being dumped into the river system flowing eventually to the Gulf of Mexico. If it's flowing downhill through pipes to do that, I'd consider a coaxial counterflow heat exchanger (pipe within a pipe) to evaporate (e.g.) alcohol, but you're probably better off with a localized plant. Is there a refinery, distillery, or sewage plant that could use the heat industrially? Alternatively, there may be something you can do with thermoacoustic generators. They are Stirling generators with no moving parts, where the heat difference drives an acoustic resonator which in turn can drive an acoustoelectric transducer. Have a look at the SCORE (Stove for Cooking, Refrigeration and Electricity) project and at Orest Symko's work in Utah.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K