How Can We Prove the Cardinality of Intervals in Real Numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Unassuming
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cardinality
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the cardinality of intervals in the real numbers, specifically showing that the cardinality of the open interval (a,b) is equal to that of (0,1) and that (0,1) is equal to (0,∞). Participants explore the concept of cardinality and the existence of one-to-one functions between these intervals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the idea that the cardinality of (0,1) is the continuum and speculate that (0,∞) may also share this property. There are attempts to define one-to-one functions to establish these cardinalities, with some questioning the validity of proposed mappings. Others suggest graphical methods and the use of trigonometric functions to explore these relationships.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various participants proposing functions and questioning their validity. Some have identified potential mappings and are seeking clarification on their correctness. There is a mix of confidence and uncertainty as participants navigate the complexities of establishing bijections between the intervals.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express concerns about continuity and the feasibility of certain mappings, particularly regarding the interval [-1,1] to (-1,1). There are references to homework constraints and the need for clear bijections, as well as discussions about the nature of rational and irrational numbers in these contexts.

Unassuming
Messages
165
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let a,b\in\Re such that a < b. Show |(a,b)|=|(0,1)| and Show |(0,1)|=|(0,\infty)|


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

]
I know that |(0,1)| is equal to the continuum and has the same cardinality as the reals. I would guess that |(0,\infty)| is also equal to the continuum. My second educated guess is that since a < b, there are an infinite amount of reals in between a and b also, therefore |(a,b)| is equal to the continuum, too. I might be wrong there.

I know that two sets have the same cardinality if I can find a one-to-one function from one to the other.

I feel like I know more than I am saying here but I cannot really come up with anything. Is it always necessary to come up with a function? The examples that I have look very hard to come up with. Thank you all, in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For |(0,1)|=|(0,inf+)|, I was thinking of a function f(x) that could take any real number in the interval of (0,inf+) and put a decimal in front of it. For example, 10 could be mapped to .10, and 12432 could be mapped to .12432.

I feel like this would be 1-1 and solve the problem. How do I write this type of function?
 
Unassuming said:
For |(0,1)|=|(0,inf+)|, I was thinking of a function f(x) that could take any real number in the interval of (0,inf+) and put a decimal in front of it. For example, 10 could be mapped to .10, and 12432 could be mapped to .12432.

I feel like this would be 1-1 and solve the problem. How do I write this type of function?
Is that really 1-1? 10 and 100 are mapped to the same thing.

Finding a 1-1 correspondence between (0,1) and (a,b) is easy: try to linearly adjust the identity map of (0,1) onto (0,1). [The way one would come up with using something like this is as follows. Draw a diagram with (0,1) as the 'x-axis' and (a,b) as the 'y-axis'. Then it becomes obvious that the easiest way to form a correspondence between these two sets is to draw a straight line going from (0,a) to (1,b).]

Find one between (0,1) and (0,inf) might be slightly tricker. Try thinking about what the tan function can do for you. [The same reasoning used above applies here; the 'y-axis' this time is (0,inf). A 1-1 correspondence is basically a curve that starts from (0,0) and shoots off to an asymptote at x=1.]
 
morphism said:
Is that really 1-1? 10 and 100 are mapped to the same thing.

Finding a 1-1 correspondence between (0,1) and (a,b) is easy: try to linearly adjust the identity map of (0,1) onto (0,1). [The way one would come up with using something like this is as follows. Draw a diagram with (0,1) as the 'x-axis' and (a,b) as the 'y-axis'. Then it becomes obvious that the easiest way to form a correspondence between these two sets is to draw a straight line going from (0,a) to (1,b).]

Find one between (0,1) and (0,inf) might be slightly tricker. Try thinking about what the tan function can do for you. [The same reasoning used above applies here; the 'y-axis' this time is (0,inf). A 1-1 correspondence is basically a curve that starts from (0,0) and shoots off to an asymptote at x=1.]

Ok, I figured both of the equations out. I found the slope and y-int of the first, and I found the trig function of the second. I had to shift the trig function which was a nice review of something I'm ashamed to have not committed to memory by now.

Is there any way to use a graph to create a mapping from [-1,1] --> (-1,1)? I immediately though of the sin function but it reaches -1, and 1 on the top and bottom.

Am I allowed to post my functions in this forum?
 
I read elsewhere that for [-1,1] --> (-1,1) it is impossible to find a continuous function. One of parts though can be constructed as follows,

Let xi be a countable sequence of distinct elements of (0,1). Then map,

0 --> x1

1 --> x2

xi --> xi + 1

Is this a clear bijection? To me (untrained eye) it seems so!
 
Last edited:
Unassuming said:
Am I allowed to post my functions in this forum?
Yes!

Is there any way to use a graph to create a mapping from [-1,1] --> (-1,1)?
I think you do have the right idea on how such a bijection can be constructed:
Let xi be a countable sequence of distinct elements of (0,1). Then map,

0 --> x1

1 --> x2

xi --> xi + 1
Can you think of how one might extend this map so that it becomes a bijection from ALL of [0,1] and onto (0,1)?

I read elsewhere that for [-1,1] --> (-1,1) it is impossible to find a continuous function.
Yes, but what does continuity have to do with anything here?
 
Unassuming said:
Let xi be a countable sequence of distinct elements of (0,1). Then map,

0 --> x1

1 --> x2

xi --> xi + 1

Is this a clear bijection? To me (untrained eye) it seems so!


Let xi be a countable sequence of distinct elements of (-1,1). Then map,

-1 --> x1

1 --> x2

xi --> xi + 2

I feel really good about this one Morphism! I am gaining ground by the hour! Check it out (Please)
 
How is that a map from [-1,1] onto (-1,1)? It's not even defined for all of [-1,1].
 
Well... I don't know then. That was as far as my brain could go with it, for now.
 
  • #10
Unassuming said:
I read elsewhere that for [-1,1] --> (-1,1) it is impossible to find a continuous function. One of parts though can be constructed as follows,

Let xi be a countable sequence of distinct elements of (0,1). Then map,

0 --> x1

1 --> x2

xi --> xi + 1

Is this a clear bijection? To me (untrained eye) it seems so!


Let x_i be all the rationals in (0,1)
it is then a bijection mapping from rationals in [0,1] to rationals in (0,1) as you can see
so, how to deal with all the irrationals? you need nothing exotic :-p
 
  • #11
x in segment (a,b) correspond to (x-a)/(b-a) in segment (0,1)
so Cardinality |(a,b)|=|(0,1)|
 
Last edited:
  • #12
x in segment (0,1) correspond to (1-x)/x in segment (0,inf)
so Cardinality |(0,1)|=|(0,inf)|
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K