How can we use the integration trick for normalisation of wave functions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bartieshaw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration technique used for normalizing wave functions, specifically focusing on the integral \(\int x^2\exp{(-ax^2)}dx\). Participants explore the application of a differentiation trick related to this integral and the evaluation of the Gaussian integral \(\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\exp{(-ax^2)}dx\), including its implications for normalization in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to apply the differentiation trick \(-\frac{d}{da}\exp{(-ax^2)}\) to evaluate the integral \(\int x^2\exp{(-ax^2)}dx\).
  • Another participant clarifies the use of the trick, suggesting that it leads to \(-\frac{d}{da}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\exp{(-ax^2)}dx\) and assumes knowledge of the Gaussian integral's value.
  • There is a mention of the known result \(\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\exp{(-ax^2)}dx=\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{a}}\), with a participant expressing curiosity about how this result is derived.
  • One participant references a previous discussion on the Gaussian integral, providing a link for further exploration.
  • A quote attributed to Lord Kelvin is shared, reflecting on the perceived obviousness of the Gaussian integral to mathematicians.
  • Another participant humorously acknowledges their struggle with integration by parts in relation to the Gaussian integral.
  • A light-hearted correction is made regarding the phrasing of a quote attributed to Lord Kelvin.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with the Gaussian integral, with some agreeing on its value while others seek clarification on its derivation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best method to evaluate the integral \(\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}x^2\exp{(-ax^2)}dx\) using the differentiation trick.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the participants' prior knowledge of integrals and differentiation techniques are present. The discussion does not resolve the steps needed to derive the Gaussian integral, leaving it open for further exploration.

bartieshaw
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hi,

This integral seems to be coming up a fair bit in questions involving normalisation of wave functions

[tex]\int x^2\exp{(-ax^2)}dx[/tex]

and my tutor and lecturer both say to just use the fact that

[tex]x^2\exp{(-ax^2)}=-\frac{d}{da}\exp{(-ax^2)}[/tex]

my question simply is how do we use this. it may be obvious can you say

[tex]\int x^2\exp{(-ax^2)}dx=\int-\frac{d}{da}\exp{(-ax^2)}dx=\int-\frac{dx}{da}\exp{(-ax^2)}d=-\frac{dx}{da}\exp{(-ax^2)}[/tex]

...?

cheers for any help,

Bart
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's like this:

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}x^2\exp{(-ax^2)}dx=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}-\frac{d}{da}\exp{(-ax^2)}dx=-\frac{d}{da}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\exp{(-ax^2)}dx[/tex]

And he assumes that you know what [itex]\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\exp{(-ax^2)}dx[/itex] equals to.
 
quasar987 said:
It's like this:

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}x^2\exp{(-ax^2)}dx=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}-\frac{d}{da}\exp{(-ax^2)}dx=-\frac{d}{da}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\exp{(-ax^2)}dx[/tex]

And he assumes that you know what [itex]\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\exp{(-ax^2)}dx[/itex] equals to.


well i do know that

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\exp{(-ax^2)}dx=\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{a}}[/tex]

so then my next question is how do we work that out (rather than me just knowing it). i started off with integration by parts and then kept on going in circles gettin back to an integral similar to

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}x^2\exp{(-ax^2)}dx[/tex]

this isn't an essential question now to what I am doing, just out of interest really...


cheers

bart
 
Talking about the identity [itex]\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\exp{(-ax^2)}dx=\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{a}}[/itex], Lord Kelvin once said "A mathematician is one to whom that is as obvious as two twice two makes four to you. Liouville was a mathematician." (quote taken from Spivak's calc. on manifolds)

Welcome to the club of the non-mathematicians.
 
quasar987 said:
You mean, how do we know that [itex]\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\exp{(-ax^2)}dx=\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{a}}[/itex]??

I did it there some time ago:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=140779&highlight=integral

see post #5.

haha...

looks like i was maybe taking a little too simple approach trying to use integratoin by parts.

cheers for the help

bart
 
Lord Kelvin may have said "twice two is four" but he surely didn't say "two twice two"!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K