How can x=tan(x)cosh2(x) be solved using trigonometry?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ognik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the equation x = tan(x)cosh²(x) and its variant x = tanh(x)cosh²(x). Participants explore numerical methods, graphing tools, and series expansions to find solutions, while also addressing typographical errors and clarifying the nature of the functions involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the equation x = tan(x)cosh²(x) can be solved numerically or by plotting, noting that it has infinite solutions, including x = 0 and several other approximate values.
  • A later post corrects the equation to x = tanh(x)cosh²(x) and proposes that the only solution is x = 0, citing the behavior of the functions involved.
  • Another participant expresses interest in solving x = ½sinh(x) and discusses the series expansion approach, leading to a quadratic equation for u = x².
  • There is a mention of the accuracy of approximations when truncating the series, with a more precise result provided using Mathematica.
  • Participants discuss the challenges of solving higher-degree polynomial equations and the reliance on numerical techniques, mentioning methods like Newton's method and the Rational Root Theorem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the solutions to the equations discussed, with multiple competing views on the existence and nature of solutions. Participants express differing opinions on the validity of approximations and the methods used to find solutions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on numerical methods for higher-degree equations and the potential inaccuracies introduced by truncating series expansions.

ognik
Messages
626
Reaction score
2
Anyone know a way to calculate x=tan(x)cosh2(x) ? I think I should know - but just blank at the moment.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you want the numbers for which the equation holds, I think you may want (and have) to do it by plotting, or using some numeric method.

It has infinite solutions, the first one has be zero since you have [itex]\tan(0)=0[/itex], some solutions are
x = 3.36922, 6.3062, 9.4263, 12.5665, 15.708
 
I suspected that, did you use a graphing tool of some sort to fund these values? (If so, what ...). Thanks
 
Terribly sorry, I had a typo - hyperbolic tan, it should be x=tanh(x)cosh2(x) [or x = 1/2 cosh(2x) ]
 
[itex]\tanh(x)[/itex] goes from zero to one, [itex]\cosh^2(x)[/itex] blows up to infinity, the only solution is x=0.

Also, [itex]\tanh(x)\cosh^2(x) = \frac{1}{2}\sinh(x)[/itex] and [itex]x = \frac{1}{2}\cosh(x)[/itex] has no solution
 
Sorry, yes, I want to solve x= ½sinh(x). IE 2x = x + x3/3! + x5/5!. Dividing by x gives 2 = 1 + x2/6 + v4/120 + ...
Letting u = x2, I have a quadratic of u2 + 20u - 120 = 0 and the positive root of this is 4.8324, giving x=2.2098 ?
 
ognik said:
Sorry, yes, I want to solve x= ½sinh(x). IE 2x = x + x3/3! + x5/5!. Dividing by x gives 2 = 1 + x2/6 + v4/120 + ...
Letting u = x2, I have a quadratic of u2 + 20u - 120 = 0 and the positive root of this is 4.8324, giving x=2.2098 ?
Not quite. When you truncated the infinite series, you lost some accuracy.

BTW, you can check these calculations yourself, either with a calculator or online, at say Wolfram Alpha.
 
As already said, that's an approximation since you are not using the whole series. A more precise result using Mathematica is 2.1773189849653067526.
By the way, I made a typo, I meant [itex]\frac{1}{2}\sinh(2x)[/itex] which solution is x=0
 
I confess I dropped the x7 and subsequent terms because I don't know how to solve the more complex equation that would result :-( So if I had (say) x8/9! + x6/7! + x4/5! + x3/3! - 1 =0, how would I approach solving that equation without using something like mathematica?
 
  • #10
ognik said:
I confess I dropped the x7 and subsequent terms because I don't know how to solve the more complex equation that would result :-( So if I had (say) x8/9! + x6/7! + x4/5! + x3/3! - 1 =0, how would I approach solving that equation without using something like mathematica?
In general, there is no formula for solving polynomial equations of degree 5 and greater. Unless you stumble on some fortuitous factorization, you're basically left with numerical techniques, like iteration or applying Newton's method. Applying things like the Rational Root Theorem and Descartes Rule of Signs may indicate how many real roots exist and which trial values to try, but it's basically trial and error.
 
  • #11
Thanks, that's all been very clear and helpful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K