How Can You Derive the Lorentz Equations from Basic Assumptions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter stevmg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Formula
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Lorentz equations from basic assumptions in special relativity. Starting with the equation x² - c²t² = x'² - c²t'² and the assumption x = vt, the user aims to derive the Lorentz transformations: x' = γ(x - vt) and t' = γ(t - xv/c²), where γ = √(1 - v²/c²). The user expresses difficulty in performing this derivation forwards, despite successfully substituting the Lorentz equations back into the original assumptions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with the Lorentz transformations
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, particularly integration
  • Proficiency in manipulating algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lorentz transformations from first principles
  • Learn about the Minkowski metric and its applications in special relativity
  • Explore the implications of time dilation and length contraction
  • Investigate the role of proper time in relativistic physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching special relativity, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of relativistic concepts.

stevmg
Messages
696
Reaction score
3
In certain physics textbooks, one starts with the assumption (in a one linear and one time dimension) that

1) x2 - c2t2 = x'2 - c2t'2

I don't want to go into that. Let us start from there.

Now, if you assume that

2) x = vt, then

3) x' = 0 always because the origin is moving at v along the x-axis so that x' is always zero.

Using those three bits of information one can derive the Lorentz equations:

x' = [tex]\gamma[/tex](x - vt)
t' = [tex]\gamma[/tex](t - xv/c2)

where [tex]\gamma[/tex] = SQRT[1 - v2/c2] (I can't get the square root to come out in LATEX)

I have tried, tried, tried to do that but I cannot.

Anyone can help?

If I substitute the Lorentz equations back into the above three bits of information, it will work out but that's backwards. I want to do it forwards.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]c^2\text{d}\tau^2=c^2\text{d}t^2-\text{d}x^2[/tex]

This is a usual way to express the minowski metric, or SR metric. [tex]\tau[/tex] is proper time, measured by an observer at rest relative to the frame being measured.

From here:

[tex]\left(\frac{\text{d}\tau}{\text{d}t}\right)^2=1-\frac{1}{c^2}\left(\frac{\text{d}x}{\text{d}t}\right)^2[/tex]

We use the symbol [tex]v[/tex] for [tex]\frac{\text{d}x}{\text{d}t}[/tex].

[tex]\left(\frac{\text{d}\tau}{\text{d}t}\right)^2=1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{\text{d}\tau}{\text{d}t}=\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}[/tex]

In the case of constant velocity, the right hand side is a constant. We can integrate wrt. [tex]t[/tex], letting [tex]\tau=t=0[/tex] initially and obtain

[tex]\tau=t\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}[/tex]

or the more familiar

[tex]t=\frac{\tau}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Perfect!

Actually, that makes it clearer than the text I was reading from.

Thanks,

Steve G
Melbourne, FL
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K