How Can You Optimize a Trebuchet for Maximum Range?

  • Thread starter Thread starter deltronzero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trebuchet
Click For Summary
To optimize a trebuchet for maximum range, key parameters include the projectile weight, counterweight, beam length, and support height. The separation angle, where the normal force equals zero, is crucial for determining the projectile's launch conditions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of energy conservation and the relationship between kinetic and potential energy in the system. Questions arise regarding the role of time in calculations, the structure of kinetic energy equations, and the consideration of angular acceleration at the moment of projectile release. Understanding these dynamics is essential for achieving optimal performance in trebuchet design.
deltronzero
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hello everyone, I'm new here and i have a few questions about the parameters of a trebuchet. sorry for such a long post.

with a simple see saw trebuchet I'm given the projectile weight and counterweight, the length and mass density of the beam, and the height of the support. i am supposed to find the optimal distance of the counterweight to the pivot and the optimal starting angle that gives the longest range when the projectile is released. first I'm supposed to find the angle made when the projectile separates from the beam (when normal force with the beam equals zero) and with that I'm supposed to find the angular velocity at the time of separation. all energy is conserved and i can ignore friction, damping, and wind.

i've calculated the inertia for the whole system along with the initial torque and I've attempted to come up with an equation which equates the final kinetic energy with the change in potential energies.

here are my questions:

a) is there any way to solve for this problem without involving time?

b) for the total final kinetic energy, would this be Iw^2 + mp*a*(distance to pivot)? with w being the final velocity taken around the pivot, mp being the mass of the projectile, and a being its acceleration? i understand that the whole system has translational motion, not just the projectile, but i don't know how to structure this.

c) in order to find the angle where the projectile is launched (normal force with beam = 0), am i to assume that at this instance there is no angular acceleration? if there is no angular acceleration at this point, the angular acceleration would have been decreasing, how do this factor in?

d) when summing moments around the pivot, do i take into account the normal forces made by the counterweight and projectile? currently I've only included the two weights and the weight of the beam.

the most important question is solving for the separation angle, I'm very confused by this. once i have an equation for that, i think everything else will fall into place.



thank you for your time, i know this post is long and this looks bad as a first post but I'm in desperate need of help. any and all help is appreciated. thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it will break away when static friction is overcome. It is needed in order to give the projectile the necessary centripetal acceleration while it is accelerated tangentially by the beam. One component of the weight assists also to keep it on the beam. Even if the beam is not accelerating the system will rotate at a constant speed if friction at the pivot is ignored. So there is no reason for the projectile to leave the system unless it falls off under the influence of gravity due to the beam rotating too slow. Is there an outside shoulder for the projectile to keep it on the beam?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
40
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K