MHB How Can You Prove Properties of Cells in Lattices Using the Complex Plane?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving properties of cells in lattices using the complex plane, specifically through the map defined by the norm on Gaussian integers. It establishes that the norm's properties lead to certain inequalities and conditions for elements in the lattice. The second point involves demonstrating that a specific function is a composition of transformations, including dilation and rotation. The third point suggests finding a lattice point that results in a norm smaller than a given value, hinting at the use of the pigeonhole principle and geometric properties of the transformations. Overall, the conversation revolves around leveraging complex analysis to explore lattice structures and their properties.
pantboio
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
I have the following assignment:consider the map $$|\cdot|:\mathbb{Z}\longrightarrow \mathbb{N},\qquad |a+ib|:=a^2+b^2$$1) Prove that $|\alpha|<|\beta|$ iff $|\alpha|\leq |\beta|-1$ and $|\alpha|<1$ iff $\alpha=0$2) Let $\alpha,\beta\in\mathbb{Z},\beta\neq 0$. Prove that the map $f:\mathbb{Z}\longrightarrow\mathbb{Z}, f(\gamma):=\alpha-\gamma\beta$ is the composition of a dilatation by the factor $\sqrt{|\beta|}$, a rotation (angle?) and a translation.3) Deduce that there exists $\gamma\in\mathbb{Z}$ such that $|f(\gamma)|$ is strictly smaller than $|\beta|$.$\textbf{Hint:}$ compare the size of a cell of the lattice $f(\mathbb{Z})$ and the size of the set of points whose distance to $0$ is $\leq\sqrt{|\beta|}$.What i did: point 1) is a trivial consequence of the fact that the norm takes integer non negative values. For point 2), I use complex multiplication of numbers which is: multiply absolute values and add angles. For point 3), I'm actually waiting for a miracle... I suppose i should prove that there exists a cell in $f(\mathbb{Z})$ intersecting the open ball centered at the origin with radius $\sqrt{|\beta|}$, but i have no idea how to write down this. Only thing i noticed is that $f$ acts with a rotation, which does not affect distance from the origin, so that the only changes in $|\gamma|$ come from dilatation and by adding $\alpha$.Could someone put me on the right direction? Thanks in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
HINT:

The pigeonhole principle. Possibly. Still thinking.
 
New idea: consider the set of points $\gamma \in \mathbb{Z}i$ such that $|\beta|\cdot|\gamma|<|\alpha|$. This set does not change under rotation, under dilation it becomes a subset of the points $x \in \mathbb{Z}i$ such that $|x|<|\alpha|$. What does that mean for the resulting translation?
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
20K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K