How Can You Solve the Infinite Series \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{n}{k^{n}}\)?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The infinite series \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{n}{k^{n}}\) can be solved by transforming it into a more recognizable form. By substituting \(z\) for \(k\) and rewriting the series as \(\tilde{S}(w) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty n w^n\), where \(w = z^{-1}\), the series can be manipulated using the properties of geometric series. The key step involves recognizing that \(nw^{n-1} = \frac{d}{dw} w^n\), allowing the use of differentiation to evaluate the sum. The series converges only when \(|z| > 1\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of infinite series and convergence concepts
  • Familiarity with geometric series and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, particularly differentiation
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving series
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of geometric series and their convergence criteria
  • Learn about uniform convergence and its implications for series manipulation
  • Explore differentiation techniques in the context of power series
  • Investigate other forms of infinite series and their solutions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus, and anyone interested in advanced series analysis and convergence properties.

YvesSch
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Recently I have been playing around with infinite series and related topics, when I realized I couldn't figure out how to solve something of the form

[itex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{n}{k^{n}}[/itex]

How would you go about finding a sum like this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the first thing to always try is see if you can get it into a form you recognize. For instance, (let me replace "k" with "z" because I typically use k as an index in sums and I don't want to confuse myself)

[tex]S(z) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{n}{z^n} = \sum_{n=1}^\infty n (z^{-1})^n.[/tex]

Now, for a moment, let me write [itex]w = z^{-1}[/itex], so that the sum is

[tex]\tilde{S}(w) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty n w^n.[/tex]

Is the sum starting to look a bit like a more familiar sum to you? It almost looks like a geometric sum, right? If it weren't for that factor of n, it would be.

So, the question you ask at this point is whether or not there is a way to involve the geometric sum somehow.

It may not be quite obvious to you how to do this, but notice two things: I can start the sum at n = 0, because the n=0 term is 0, and if I pull a factor of w out of the sum,

[tex]\tilde{S}(w) = w \sum_{n=0}^\infty n w^{n-1}.[/tex]

Now comes another common trick when dealing with sums: notice that [itex]nw^{n-1} = \frac{d}{dw} w^n[/itex]. That means,

[tex]\tilde{S}(w) = w \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{d}{dw}\left[w^n\right] = w \frac{d}{dw}\left[\sum_{n=0}^\infty w^n\right],[/tex]

where I've used the linearity of the derivative to pull it outside of summation (the sum of the derivatives is the derivative of the sum). Note that you can't always do this - there are cases where the convergence of the infinite sum is not nice enough that you can exchange the derivative and the sum. In this case however, since the sum is uniformly (absolutely?) convergent (for a domain I will specify momentarily) we can do that. (I may be off on which kind of convergence is sufficient).

Anywho, now you can see that the sum inside the derivative is just the geometric series sum, so you can use that result to find [itex]\tilde{S}(w)[/itex], and then set w = 1/z again to get S(z).

Recall, however, that the geometric series only gives a finite result if |w| < 1, which implies that S(z) is only finite if |z| > 1.
 
That was elegant and exactly what I was looking for. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K