Comp Sci How Comprehensive Should an Undergraduate Explanation of MPLS Be?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shivajikobardan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mystery
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on how comprehensive an undergraduate explanation of MPLS should be for an 8-10 mark question. The local textbook provides a brief overview of MPLS components, path setup, and packet handling, but the author feels this may be insufficient for a full answer. Suggested additions include a detailed explanation of the MPLS shim header, differences between conventional routing and MPLS forwarding, and definitions of key terms like FEC and LSP. The author is also considering visual aids to enhance understanding but is unsure if the depth of information required justifies a longer response. Ultimately, the author seeks clarity on whether a more extensive explanation is necessary for an undergraduate level.
shivajikobardan
Messages
637
Reaction score
54
Homework Statement
What should I exactly write when I am asked how MPLS works?
Relevant Equations
None
Say there is a subject of 80 marks and I have 8-10 marks question about "How MPLS works".

I will list the information that I am planning to write(but I want your feedback on what I should write?)

What my local author textbook (that our teachers use to teach) writes-:
1) gives 1 line info about each components of mpls shim header
2) says that optimum LSP is established along with QoS parameters(2 lines).
then says
Packet enters through LERs and gets assigned a label. And it gets forwarded to LSPs. Within the domain, the LSP gets packet, remove the incoming label and attach the outgoing label and then forwards to next label switching router.
Finally the another LER strips the label reads the Ip and forwards the packet. and then normal forwarding is done.(IP forwarding).

But I feel like this is too less information for 8 marks questions. But I also feel like there is really nth more than this to explain for an undergraduate course.
These 2 topics were called "path setup" and "packet handling".
What more topics should I include in my answer? Or is this enough. I know you might say ask your teacher, this is what their slides write.

1654048318567.png

1654048345952.png

1654048357388.png

Is this information enough for 8 marks questions of UG course? Are there any details that I am missing?

What I am planning to write-:
1) mpls shim header

2) difference between conventional routing vs mpls forwarding

3) some terms related to mpls like FEC, LSP, LER,LSR, LDP (1 line definitions)

4) figure showing LER, LSR and LSP. simple one (might add LBIF as well)

5) Short explanation of how it works i.e the same thing written in slides. first comes to edge router, gets a label and based on that label gets forwarded unidirectionally and the last router pops the label and then ip forwarding starts again.

Would it be enough(not in the sense if it would be enough for my teacher..but in the sense does it really explains how mpls works?)
I am confused. It can't be this simple that you write 3 lines and you are done with the working.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1654049509463.png

I have found sth like this somewhere, would it be necessary to write about all these for an undergraduate course? it would go from 5-10 pages. ibm tcpip redbook has like 40 pages about these lol.
I found this from wikipedia, it covers most of the stuffs that I have learned from various books. I think this will do the job.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiprotocol_Label_Switching#Routing
 

Attachments

  • 1654058081663.png
    1654058081663.png
    47.7 KB · Views: 144
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
13K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
10K
Back
Top