How did we arrive to Hamilton's principle ?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Hamilton's principle, also known as the principle of stationary action, can be derived from Newton's laws under specific conditions, particularly when all constraints are holonomic. This principle leads to the Lagrange equations, similar to how Newton's laws do. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding generalized forces, which are relevant in the context of non-conservative forces. For a deeper understanding, readers are encouraged to consult H. Goldstein's "Classical Mechanics" and C. Lanczos's "The Variational Principles of Mechanics."

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics
  • Knowledge of holonomic and non-holonomic constraints
  • Basic concepts of generalized forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Hamilton's equations derived from the Legendre transformation
  • Explore the implications of holonomic versus non-holonomic constraints in mechanics
  • Learn about the role of generalized forces in non-conservative systems
  • Read H. Goldstein's "Classical Mechanics" for a comprehensive overview of Hamilton's principle
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mechanical engineers, and researchers interested in classical mechanics and variational principles will benefit from this discussion.

Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
Hi. The Lagrange equations can be derived simply by using Newton's laws and defining potential, work and kinetic energy. So that's just a mathematical reformulation of known results.

Is it the same with Hamilton's principle? Is the concept of "action" and it being stationary just another mathematical reformulation from Newton's laws, or is it something else? Because Hamilton's principle leads to the Langrange equations just the same as Newton's laws.

My professor did not discuss this. He simply presented Hamilton's principle as a postulate and left it at that.

PS: What is up with this "generalized force" thing? I don't exactly understand what that is all about. Would appreciate it if somebody could explain briefly.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The principle of stationary action (in the Lagrangian or Hamiltonian form) is usually taken as an axiom. You can only constantly check its validity by producing the correct equations of motion.
 
Hamiltons equations follow from the definition of the hamiltonian as a Legendre transformation ##H = \dot qp - L##
If you then write down the differential ##dH## you instantly get hamiltons out of it (try it!).

Generalised forces work just the same as coordinates, velocities, moment etc the force along your coordinate vector. It's just that the only forces we care about the non-conservative ones that you can't account for as energy so in a lot of cases you just don't care about the force part at all.
So
\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{\partial L}{d\dot q_i}) - \frac{\partial L}{dq_i} = F_i
would reduce to a 0 in the right part if we only have conservative forces.
 
Nikitin said:
Hi. The Lagrange equations can be derived simply by using Newton's laws and defining potential, work and kinetic energy. So that's just a mathematical reformulation of known results.

Is it the same with Hamilton's principle? Is the concept of "action" and it being stationary just another mathematical reformulation from Newton's laws, or is it something else? Because Hamilton's principle leads to the Langrange equations just the same as Newton's laws.

My professor did not discuss this. He simply presented Hamilton's principle as a postulate and left it at that.

PS: What is up with this "generalized force" thing? I don't exactly understand what that is all about. Would appreciate it if somebody could explain briefly.

Hamilton's principle (principle of stationary action) can be derived from Newton's laws and some additional assumptions about the mechanical system. The important one that comes to mind is that all constraints have to be holonomic. If the mechanical problem has non-holonomic constraints (e.g. sphere rolling on ground with no slipping), usual Hamilton's principle does not work. Also if friction dissipates mechanical energy Hamilton's principle is hard to formulate and I think it is little used there.

Check the book H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics for exposé of Hamilton's principle. There is also book by C. Lanczos, The Variational Principles of Mechanics which might help.
 
allright. thanks guys
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
927