How different is L&S from an engineering program?

Thread starter joej24
Start date Jun 9, 2011
Tags

Engineering Program

AI Thread Summary

Colleges often differentiate between engineering programs and liberal arts and sciences (L&S) programs, which can create confusion for prospective students. Engineering programs typically focus on applied sciences and technical skills, preparing students for specific careers in fields like civil, mechanical, or electrical engineering. In contrast, L&S programs, such as physics, emphasize theoretical knowledge and broader scientific principles, which can lead to diverse career paths, including research, education, or interdisciplinary fields. The choice between these programs can significantly influence career options, but it's important to note that many institutions offer flexibility, allowing students to switch majors or pursue interdisciplinary studies. Ultimately, the decision should consider personal interests and career aspirations rather than feeling constrained by the initial choice of program.

Jun 9, 2011

joej24

The colleges I have been looking to apply to seem to have different schools/programs for engineering and sciences(L&S). How different are these programs for majors for such as physics and engineering? I've never done any sort of engineering in high school so I can't really make an educated decision. I hope my career and job options aren't set just from a mere decision of picking one program over the other.

Physics news on Phys.org

Jun 9, 2011

fss

Depends on the institution.

Thread 'Which branch of engineering is more physics heavy?'

I will be entering engineering but i want to do graduate studies in physics after it so im searching for the branch with most physics so it would be abit easier of a transition. Im trying to decide between nuclear engineering or electronics and engineering

View full post »

Thread 'Where did all the “fundamentals-deepening” master’s programs go?'

I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

View full post »

Thread 'Applied Math PhD candidate but I hate group theory'

TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

View full post »