How Do Cantilever Beam Calculations Determine Minimum Bending Stiffness?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum bending stiffness (EI) required for a cantilever beam subjected to two uniformly distributed loads (UDLs) and a point load. The beam length is 2 meters, with loads of 1000 N/m, 1000 N, and 500 N/m applied at specified locations. The correct approach involves using Bernoulli-Euler Bending Theory and applying superposition to determine the deflection at the free end for each load case. The final calculation yields a required EI of 98.95E4.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bernoulli-Euler Bending Theory
  • Familiarity with cantilever beam mechanics
  • Knowledge of superposition principle in structural analysis
  • Ability to perform double integration for deflection calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Bernoulli-Euler Bending Theory in detail
  • Learn about superposition in structural analysis
  • Practice calculating deflections for various load cases on cantilever beams
  • Explore advanced topics in beam theory, such as shear and moment diagrams
USEFUL FOR

Engineering students, structural engineers, and anyone involved in mechanical design or analysis of cantilever beams will benefit from this discussion.

ttbg2
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



As in the attachment; cantilever beam with two UDLs and a point load of 1000N/m, 1000N, and 500N/m respectively. First UDL acts over the first 1m, point load at 1m, and the next udl over the next meter - so the total beam length is 2m. Max tip deflection is 2mm, what is the minimum bending stiffness (EI) required.

Homework Equations



Bernoulli-Euler Bending Theory

The Attempt at a Solution



EIv'' = (1000*1*0.5) + 1000*1 + (500*1*1.5)
EIv'' = 2250

EIv' = 2250x + A
EIv = 1125x^2 + Ax + B

Boundary Conditions v(0)=v'(0)=0
A=0 B=0

v(2m)=2mm
EI = 22.5 E5

Answer is 98.95E4

I'm guessing my mistake is in either the boundary conditions or the actual initial creating of the EIv'' equation.

Any help would be hugely appreciated!

Cheers, Ben
 

Attachments

  • q2solids.jpg
    q2solids.jpg
    22.9 KB · Views: 2,194
Physics news on Phys.org
We haven't seen your attachmnet yet, but from your description, your boundary conditions are OK, but your EIv" equation is not. You cannot just take the maximum moment (2250 N-m) at the fixed end and apply it in the equation. The moment must be written as a function of x. I haven't done this calc in awhile, but it would appear best to me that you look at each load case separately: A udl of 500 N/m across the entire beam, then the point load of 1000 N at x = 1m, then a udl of 500 N/m over the first 1 m. Determine the deflection at the free end for each case, and add them up via superposition. You're probably going to need to find the slope of the deflection curve at 1 m out to solve for the free end deflection for the last 2 loadings.

BTW, welcome to PF!
 
PhanthomJay said:
We haven't seen your attachmnet yet, but from your description, your boundary conditions are OK, but your EIv" equation is not. You cannot just take the maximum moment (2250 N-m) at the fixed end and apply it in the equation. The moment must be written as a function of x. I haven't done this calc in awhile, but it would appear best to me that you look at each load case separately: A udl of 500 N/m across the entire beam, then the point load of 1000 N at x = 1m, then a udl of 500 N/m over the first 1 m. Determine the deflection at the free end for each case, and add them up via superposition. You're probably going to need to find the slope of the deflection curve at 1 m out to solve for the free end deflection for the last 2 loadings.

BTW, welcome to PF!

Cheers! Google has taken me here a few times whilst searching odd engineering based thing. I'm pretty stuck though so thought I'd sign up!

I'll have another go at sorting the equations out - all the previous examples I've done have been without any physical numbers and have only had single loads which is where my confusion has come from I guess. Don't think you fully understand (no doubt my rubbish explanation) where the loads are acting, however when the attachment is approved it will all be clear.

Cheers again!
 
I see your attachment and you explained it well. You have

(1.) a uniform distributed load of 500 N/m along the entire beam length, L;
(2.) a concentrated 1000 N load at its center (at L/2), and then
(3.) an additional 500 N/m uniformly distributed load over the first meter (I've taken the 1000 N/m shown and subtracted out the 500 N/m already included in (1.) above. I believe it is easier to solve the problem this way).

So now calculate the deflection (as a function of EI) at the tip, for each load case, add them up , and set them equal to 0.002 m to solve for EI. In calculating the deflection, you must write the moment as a function of x for each load case, before integrating. For example , for the 1000N load, P, the moment, M , is P(L/2) - Px, between x = 0 and x = L/2, and M = 0 between x = L/2 and x = L. Double integrate over the first half of the beam to get the deflection, v, at L/2, single integrate to get the slope of the deflection curve, v', at L/2, and then calculate the tip deflection using trig (the 2nd part of the beam has no moment, but it goes along for the ride and deflects accordingly). Continue for the other loads. Requires patience...and time.
 
How do I start a post, I have an engineering question about cantilever beams?
 
Vols_gradCC said:
How do I start a post, I have an engineering question about cantilever beams?
After you click on the engineering/comp sci/technology sub-forum in the homework help forum, click on "New Topic" somewhere in the top left of the screen. Be sure to follow the template.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
13K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K