How do charges behave in a spherical conducting shell?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FrogPad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conducting Shell
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of charges within a spherical conducting shell when subjected to different point charges at the center. When a positive point charge Q is placed at the center, a negative charge of -Q is induced on the inner surface of the shell, while a positive charge of +Q is induced on the outer surface. Conversely, if a negative point charge is placed at the center, a positive charge appears on the inner surface and a negative charge on the outer surface. The principles governing these phenomena are rooted in Gauss' law and the behavior of free electrons in conductors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' law
  • Knowledge of electric fields and charge distribution
  • Familiarity with the properties of conductors
  • Concept of induced charge in electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Gauss' law in electrostatics
  • Explore charge distribution in non-uniform electric fields
  • Investigate the behavior of charges in non-symmetrical conducting surfaces
  • Learn about the concept of electric field lines in conductors
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding electrostatics and the behavior of charges in conductive materials.

FrogPad
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
I never really understood this...

Lets say we have a positive point charge Q at the center of a spherical conducting shell of an inner radius Ri and an outer radius R0.

Now my books says that an amount of negative charge equal to -Q must be induced on the inner shell surface (R=Ri), and that an amount of positve .
charge +Q is induced on the outer shell surface (R=R0).

Why is this?

What would happen if a negative point charge was placed in the center?
I would assume that the inner shell would have an induced positve charge, and the outer shell would have an induced negative charge. Again, why is this?

Also what would happen if there was no charge at the center, and instead a charge was placed on the outside of the shell near the conducting surface?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The main reason for this is because an isolated conductor cannot cannot have electric field lines within them. A simple application of Gauss' law ( reread that :)) should give you all the answers.

Cheers
Nithin
 
What I wasn't understanding is why there is an induced charge on the surface of the shells. After thinking about it some more, I think I have I remember why it happens. Since the outer electrons are free to dissociate themselves they are effected by an electric field. So when we place the +Q point charge in the center, all the free negative charge is pulled towards the +Q. On the other hand the positve charge in the shell moves as far away from the +Q as possible, this happens to be the bounds of the shell.

A similar argument can be made for placing a negative charge inside the shell, or any charge outside of the shell.

I guess my problem is visualizing the symmetry. Yes, I can visualize the charge arrangment in this case. But, what happens if we place the near a conducting wall that is not centered ([itex]R \new 0[/itex]). From my argument above I would conclude that negative charge would get as close as possible to the +Q point charge, and positve charge would form on the surface. However this would produce a non-uniform electric field around the conducting shell, and we would need some more information, because the charges on the conducting shell are not cancelling nicely.

Is this logic correct?
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
779
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K