How Do Convection Currents Operate at the Molecular Level?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ArielGenesis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convection Current
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Convection currents operate at the molecular level primarily due to the energy of particles rather than changes in density. Heated particles possess more energy, resulting in increased movement and random motion, which is influenced by intermolecular collisions and gravity. The discussion highlights that convection can occur without gravity, but in practical scenarios, gravity significantly enhances heat transfer. The animation referenced demonstrates the behavior of hot and cold particles, illustrating the principles of convection.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of molecular motion and kinetic energy
  • Basic principles of convection and heat transfer
  • Familiarity with Brownian motion
  • Knowledge of fluid dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the principles of heat transfer in fluids using "Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer" by Frank P. Incropera
  • Investigate the role of gravity in convection currents through "Introduction to Fluid Mechanics" by Robert W. Fox
  • Examine simulations of convection currents using tools like PhET Interactive Simulations
  • Research the effects of temperature gradients on fluid behavior in "Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach" by Yunus Çengel
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, engineers focusing on thermal systems, and anyone interested in the molecular dynamics of convection currents.

ArielGenesis
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
I am thinking that convection current does happens not because of changed in density. I based this argument with viewing the problem from particle / molecular scale. Density = Mass/ Volume. Yet in molecules of water, discussing mass and volume would less likely to be relevant as mass and volume of each molecule is identical. Therefore, I prefer not to understad convection current as incerease and decrease in density due heat. I prefer to see it as particles having more or less energy (calculated from the movement speed) moving in brownian random motion. What happened actually is that the heated particle contain more energy and move faster (randomly). Their horizontal motion (XY plane) are perfectly disturbed by inter-molecular collision within themselves and walls of the container while their vertical motion (Z axis) are affected by the same factor and gravity. This gravity factor enable particle with more energy move higher then the particle with lesser. This action is simulated in www.geocities.com/arian_m3/heat.swf by using macromedia flash. I am assuming that this effect caused the change in density and therefore convection current not just by heatting a volume of fluid which then rise.

In the animation, red is the hotter particle and blue is the cooler particle. The system is not heatted and the hot stays hot while the cold stays cold.

I am writing an essay about this topic and waiting for suggestion and comments.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure if i posted this on the correct forum.
 
The mechanism, which you have proposed, can indeed exist in the absense of gravity, or in horizontal direction. In a real life the convection mechanism will always overtake it, because it will provide much stronger heat transfer.
For example, if you put a pot near the open fire it will be more difficult to boil the water than when the pot is placed at the same distance above the fire. You may say that is because flame will touch the pot. But flame is actually a very hot air, nothing more, so the pot will be heated by an air convection.
 
No not yet, but the first post is just for fun, while this one is for real.

shyboy, how could convection occurs without acceleration such gravity. And I could careless of how the water is heated, what i am concern of is the convection current in the pot.

Someone told me that convection current cannot be explain by looking at single particle and should be viewed as bulk.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K