How Do Friction Coefficients Affect Acceleration on a Frictionless Surface?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a 4.0-kg toboggan on a frictionless surface with a 2.0 kg block on top. The coefficients of static and kinetic friction between the block and the toboggan are provided, along with a horizontal force applied to the block. The discussion centers on determining the accelerations of both the block and the toboggan.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculations for normal force and frictional forces acting on both the block and the toboggan. Questions arise regarding the conditions under which the block remains stationary relative to the toboggan and the implications of static versus kinetic friction coefficients.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest that the toboggan will slide due to the applied force, while others question the necessity of considering kinetic friction in the scenario. There is acknowledgment of potential confusion regarding the roles of static and kinetic friction in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the frictionless nature of the surface and the specific values of static and kinetic friction, which are central to the discussion. There is also mention of a possible misunderstanding regarding the application of these coefficients in determining motion.

bumblebeeliz
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 4.0-kg toboggan rests on a frictionless icy surface, and a 2.0 kg block rests on top of the
toboggan. The coefficient of static friction µs between the block and the surface of the toboggan is 0.60, whereas the kinetic friction coefficient is 0.51. The block is pulled by a
30 N horizontal force as shown. What are the magnitudes and directions of the
resulting accelerations of the block and the toboggan?


Homework Equations



Ffr = \mus Fn = \mus mg
Ffr = \muk Fn = \muk mg

Fn = mg

\SigmaF= ma


The Attempt at a Solution



Fn= (m1 + m2) g
Fn= (2.0kg + 4.0kg) (9.80m/s2)
Fn= 58.8 N

Now I calculate the friction of both separately: (im not sure about this part)

Box:

Ffr = 0.60 (58.8N)
Ffr = 35.25N

Tob:

Ffr = 0.51 (58.8N)
Ffr= 29.988N

Then I attempt the acceleration:

\Sigma=m1a
Fr-F=ma
35.25N-30N = (2kg) a
5.25N/2kg = a
2.625 m/s2 = a

\Sigma= m2a
F-Ffr =ma
30N-29.988N = (4kg) a
0.003 m/s2 = a (or 3 x 10-3)

This is where I get confuse. When the box is pulled doesn't it stay static while the sled slides on the ice? And what do they mean by direction?

Any help would be great :)
 

Attachments

  • assignment1_16.png
    assignment1_16.png
    3.7 KB · Views: 512
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember the ice is frictionless, so the only friction you need to work out is for the box on the toboggan, Ff = 0.6*2*g = 11.77 N.
This means the "grip" of the toboggan on the box is 11.77N - the maximum force without slipping, so the maximum acceleration is a = F/m = 11.77/2 = 5.89 N.
If we are trying to accelerate more than that, we will have a complex problem where the box slides along the toboggan. However, we are only trying to accelerate at
a = F/m = 30/6 = 5 m/s2, so there will be no sliding.
 
But don't we know from the very beginning that the toboggan will not slide just by looking at the static and kinetic friction values.

Doesn't \mus mean that it will only move if it is higher than 0.60? And since the \muk is smaller we know it will not accelerate?
 
The toboggan must slide on the ice - a force is applied and there is no opposing force.
Doesn't LaTeX Code: \\mu s mean that it will only move if it is higher than 0.60? And since the LaTeX Code: \\mu k is smaller we know it will not accelerate?
I don't understand this. You use the static coefficient if the box is not sliding, the kinetic one if it is.
 
Sorry. I have trouble explaining physics.

Ok, so basically it was a trick question because we actually do not need the \muk which is 0.51 for the toboggan?
 
bumblebeeliz said:
But don't we know from the very beginning that the toboggan will not slide just by looking at the static and kinetic friction values.

Doesn't \mus mean that it will only move if it is higher than 0.60? And since the \muk is smaller we know it will not accelerate?

\mu_s is usually larger than \mu_k, for any surface. Think of your normal experiences when pulling something. Once you get it started sliding, is it harder or easier to pull than before it started moving?
 
Definitely easier to pull after it started sliding. Makes sense! Thanks.
 
Right, you don't need the kinetic friction this time.
 
This means the "grip" of the toboggan on the box is 11.77N - the maximum force without slipping, so the maximum acceleration is a = F/m = 11.77/2 = 5.89
Oops; I made a mistake here! The mass of the toboggan is 4, not 2. So the box does slide along the toboggan and you have to use kinetic friction. Thanks to a sharp student for catching this! I commented on the same question correctly 6 months before making this mistake. Sorry, bumblebeeliz.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K