How Do Groups Relate to Symmetry in Mathematics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Cincinnatus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups Symmetry
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between groups and the concept of symmetry in mathematics. Participants explore various examples of groups, such as GL_2(R), SU(3), and A_4, and question how these relate to the notion of symmetry, both in intuitive and formal contexts. The conversation also touches on the concept of quotient groups and seeks to clarify their structure and isomorphisms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about the statement that "groups are the algebraic equivalent to the notion of symmetry," particularly regarding groups like GL_2(R) and their connection to symmetry.
  • Others argue that groups such as SU(3) and exceptional groups like E_6 can also be viewed as having algebraic notions of symmetry, though this may not be immediately clear.
  • One participant suggests that the alternating group A_4, representing the rotational symmetries of a tetrahedron, provides a clearer example of symmetry in relation to groups.
  • There is a discussion on the broader understanding of symmetry beyond isometries, with a focus on the axioms of groups involving compositions and inverses of motions.
  • A participant raises a question about quotient groups, specifically SL_2(C)/(+-I), and expresses confusion about its structure and potential isomorphisms.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the notation of (+-I), with a participant correcting their earlier statement to indicate it refers to the set {+I, -I}, where I is the identity matrix.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the relationship between groups and symmetry, with multiple competing views and interpretations presented throughout the discussion. The understanding of quotient groups also remains unresolved, as participants express differing levels of clarity and confusion.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations in understanding arise from the abstract nature of certain groups and their symmetries, as well as the specific definitions and properties of quotient groups that are not fully explored in the discussion.

Cincinnatus
Messages
389
Reaction score
0
I hear all the time people saying things like "groups are the algebraic equivalent to the notion of symmetry". Yet I don't think I've ever really understood what was meant by this. I'm familiar with groups of symmetries (like the dihedral groups), but in these cases, to me it just seems like we are using the language of groups to talk about the ordinary notion of symmetry.

It seems like people are saying all groups have "something to do with an algebraic notion of symmetry" What this might be though is unclear to me. For example, what does the group GL_2(R) have to do with symmetry?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cincinnatus said:
It seems like people are saying all groups have "something to do with an algebraic notion of symmetry" What this might be though is unclear to me. For example, what does the group GL_2(R) have to do with symmetry?

If I tell you that the Lie group SU(3) (isomorphic to the set of 3x3 unitary matrices with determinant 1) is "a group which has something to do with an algebraic notion of some symmetry in nature", would you too have problem with that? What about say exceptional group [tex]E_6[/tex] or special orthogonal group [tex]SO(10)[/tex]??

How about the alternating group [tex]A_4[/tex]: the rotational symmetry group of a regular tetrahedron. In other words, it is "an algebraic notion" of the set of all inequivalent rotations of a tetrahedron. Would you find this more palatable than the above examples?

If so, I guess the reason you find that the [tex]A_4[/tex] situation is "clearer" because you can related to things that you are accustomed to. that doesn't automatically mean that [tex]SU(3)[/tex] is not a "symmetry" of some sort.

If we wish to study symmetry in a formal and consistent way, we need to define some rules, rules that are obviously motivated by things/symmetry that we are accustomed to (eg. rotation of a square, reflection of a triangle etc..). We've picked out the crucial features that make a symmetry a symmetry and call them axioms of group theory. But with these rules we can also study symmetries that are much harder to visualise (eg. rotations of 10-dimensional hypercube). And that's the power of mathematics and science can bring you.
 
Last edited:
"symmetry" has to be understood more broadly than just isometry.
 
think about what symmetry MEAns. there are some motions, called symmetries, which can be composed, and which have inverses.

thats it. those ARE THE AXIOMS OF A GROUP.
 
Thanks for your help.

I have another question, I'm also trying to get a more intuitive feel for what is meant by a quotient group.

I understand examples like R/(2piZ) (under addition), I can see how this is isomorphic to the circle group and to the group of complex numbers with modulus 1 (under multiplication).

When I try to think about other groups, for example: SL_2(C)/(+-I) I get quickly confused.

Is that group isomorphic to a direct product of some other group with itself? It seems to me like it should be... Clearly there is something about quotient groups that I am not understanding.
 
Cincinnatus said:
Thanks for your help.When I try to think about other groups, for example: SL_2(C)/(+-I) I get quickly confused.

What is +-I ? Is this the purely imaginary numbers? If so, the answer is Z_2 = {0,1} under addition mod 2.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, I meant the set {+I,-I} where I is the identity matrix. SL_2(C)/(+-I) should be the group of Mobius Transformations.

I also don't see how you get Z_2 if (+-I) had meant the purely imaginary numbers...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K