How do I account for a Jacobian when changing coordinates for two particles?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the computation of matrix elements for a two-body quantum-mechanical potential, specifically the integral involving the change of coordinates from individual particle positions to center-of-mass and relative coordinates. The transformation is defined as \(\overset{\rightarrow}{r} \equiv ( \overset{\rightarrow}{r}_1 - \overset{\rightarrow}{r_2} ) / 2\) and \(\overset{\rightarrow}{R} \equiv ( \overset{\rightarrow}{r}_1 + \overset{\rightarrow}{r_2} ) / 2\). The user expresses concern about missing an overall Jacobian factor during the coordinate transformation from \(d^3 r_1 d^3 r_2\) to \(d^3 R d^3 r\). The solution involves recognizing the relationship between the differentials and the orientation of the area elements, leading to the conclusion that the Jacobian determinant is \(-2\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and matrix elements
  • Familiarity with coordinate transformations in multiple dimensions
  • Knowledge of Jacobians in calculus
  • Experience with Fourier transforms in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Jacobians for multiple variable transformations
  • Learn about the implications of coordinate transformations in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the use of Fourier transforms in quantum field theory
  • Investigate the role of orientation in differential geometry
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those working in quantum mechanics, researchers in theoretical physics, and students studying advanced calculus and differential geometry.

UVCatastrophe
Messages
37
Reaction score
8
I am computing matrix elements of a two body quantum-mechanical potential, which take the form

V_{k l m n} = \int d^3 r_1 d^3 r_2 e^{-i k \cdot r_1} e^{-i l \cdot r_2} V( | r_1-r_2 | ) e^{i m \cdot r_1} e^{i n \cdot r_2}

To do this integral, I make the change of coordinates
\overset{\rightarrow}{r} \equiv ( \overset{\rightarrow}{r}_1 - \overset{\rightarrow}{r}_2 ) / 2, \overset{\rightarrow}{R} \equiv ( \overset{\rightarrow}{r}_1 + \overset{\rightarrow}{r}_2 ) / 2 ,

which gives a momentum conserving delta function times the Fourier transform of the potential. This is exactly what as expected, but I am concerned that I am missing an overall Jacobian factor when I make the swap

d^3 r_1 d^3 r_2 \rightarrow d^3 R d^3 r

I know how to get Jacobians for a single particle's coordinates, but for some reason I can't think straight about two particles. Can anyone provide guidance on this issue?

thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I figured it out...

Suppose X \equiv (x + y)/2 , Y \equiv (x - y)/2. Then dx \wedge dy = (dX + dY) \wedge (dX - dY) = dY \wedge dX - dX \wedge dY = -2 dX \wedge dY

I am being sloppy, because I am planning on throwing out that minus sign; perhaps someone can enlighten me (I think it has to do with orientation; in any case area elements can't be negative -- that would just be nonsense!)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K