How do I accurately measure and convert g-force in smaller time intervals?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around measuring and converting g-force in smaller time intervals, specifically focusing on how to accurately calculate acceleration when sampling at intervals of 0.5 seconds versus 1 second. The subject area includes concepts of acceleration, velocity, and gravitational forces.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to convert g-force readings into meters per second per second, considering the implications of sampling at different intervals. Some participants question the validity of the original poster's understanding of acceleration and the relationship between force and acceleration.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of acceleration and its calculation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the distinction between force and acceleration, and the original poster expresses some clarity following the feedback received.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the definitions of static acceleration and the effects of gravitational force on objects at rest, which is being actively discussed among participants.

matt_uk
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. If I measure the acceleration of an object every 1 second, I will have a g-force which I can use formula 1 to convert into meters per second per second. Therefore I know from the result of this formula how much the object has accelerated/de-accelerated in the last second.

If however I wish to sample the acceleration of an object every 0.5 of a second, I can get a more accurate reading as the object may not accelerate/deaccelerate at the same rate for an entire second. My problem is converting the output to suit the 0.5 second interval.




Homework Equations



formula 1 = meters per second per second = (gForce - 1) * 9.8

gForce is subtracted by 1 because at 1g an object is stationery.

The Attempt at a Solution


I again use formula 1 to convert g-force into meters per second per second - but this time I think I should divide the result of the answer by 2, as only half a second has passed, so if we have an acceleration of 2G at 0.5 seconds, then we've actually only accelerated by (9.8 / 2 = 4.7 meters per second per second).

I sample the acceleration again at exactly 1 second and again divide the result by 2 as I'm only interested in the acceleration from 0.5 seconds to 1 second. If i add this result to the previous result, i should have the acceleration for the object in 1 second.

Does this sound right to you?

Many thanks in advance
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are making things overly complicated. Acceleration is just (change in velocity)/(change in time). So if you have velocity samples at 1 sec intervals then you divide the difference by 1 sec. If you have samples at 1/2 sec intervals then you divide by 1/2 sec. Your formula 1 is strange. What makes you think that 'at 1g objects are stationary'?
 
Dick said:
I think you are making things overly complicated. Acceleration is just (change in velocity)/(change in time). So if you have velocity samples at 1 sec intervals then you divide the difference by 1 sec. If you have samples at 1/2 sec intervals then you divide by 1/2 sec. Your formula 1 is strange. What makes you think that 'at 1g objects are stationary'?

Hi

Thanks for your reply, as far as I am aware all objects at rest are subject to a 1g static acceleration due to the Earth’s gravitation attraction, because I am only interested in the dynamic acceleration, the above calculation of acceleration is off by 1g due to the aforementioned gravitational attraction of Earth. The actual dynamic acceleration should be the above value minus 1g.

I guess what its confusing me is the units "meters per second per second".

Matt.
 
Objects at rest aren't subject to any acceleration at all. They are subject to a FORCE (mg) which would cause an acceleration of 1g, except that it is balanced by equal and opposite normal force from the floor which gives a net acceleration of 0g. Don't confuse forces and acceleration. They are not the same thing. Referring to a 'force' as a 'static acceleration' is going to cause nothing but confusion. And since a=v/t, v is measured in m/sec, t is measured in sec, hence 'a' is measured in (m/sec)/(sec).
 
Thanks Dick

Think you've cleared up most of my confusion.

Matt.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K