How do I calculate the equivalence capacitance of this circuit?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the equivalence capacitance of a circuit involving multiple capacitors with given values. The subject area is electrical circuits, specifically focusing on capacitance in series and parallel configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to analyze the circuit by proposing different configurations of the capacitors, suggesting that some may be in series while others are in parallel. They express confusion regarding the correct arrangement and calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some questioning the clarity of the circuit diagram and others providing feedback on the proposed equations. There is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet, but guidance is being offered regarding the interpretation of the series and parallel rules for capacitance.

Contextual Notes

There are constraints related to the visibility of the circuit diagram, as some participants are unable to access the provided link. This has led to suggestions for alternative ways to share the diagram.

Bishop556
Messages
37
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


http://loncapa2.fsu.edu/enc/66/45d3639022485d2ba995cf84c579b584bffe5ace9851f3da3fbac5f5a1c7d2ee9dfed8743cf75459ef336ad7a1bbe176f7a0cf1a35a519ce0cef3c31febf9858404cac5a2cd3ace3851dbef61ee03a25f7a5c41a87b32e0f.gif

Calculate the equivalence capacitance of the circuit shown in the diagram above; where C1 = 8.65 μF, C2 = 4.00 μF, C3 = 8.55 μF, C4 = 3.20 μF.


Homework Equations



Capacitance in a series: 1/Ctot = Ʃ(1/C)

Capacitance in parallel: Ctot = ƩC

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I attempted multiple ways to order each capacitor into a way to solve a formula. In my sixth attempt I presumed that C1 and C2 are in a series and are parallel to C3. I also believe C4 is parallel to C3, so here is my equation:

C = (1/C1 + 1/C2) + C3 + C4

Another idea that came into ferment was the concept of thinking that C2 and C3 are in series and are parallel to C1. C4 would be parallel to C2 and C3 so:

C = C1 + (1/C2 + 1/C3) + C4

I could go on, but since my professor never went over this I am thoroughly confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show the circuit diagram, please.

ehild
 
If you can't see it on the thread, then here is the link:

http://loncapa2.fsu.edu/enc/66/45d3639022485d2ba995cf84c579b584bffe5ace9851f3da3fbac5f5a1c7d2ee9dfed8743cf75459ef336ad7a1bbe176f7a0cf1a35a519ce0cef3c31febf9858404cac5a2cd3ace3851dbef61ee03a25f7a5c41a87b32e0f.gif
 
I can not open the link. It is not safe.

Anyway, the equation you wrote "C = (1/C1 + 1/C2) + C3 + C4" is wrong.
The resultant of the series capacitors is 1/(1/C1+1/C2).

ehild
 
I can't see image by either method.

Suggest you upload as an attachment?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K