How Do I Calculate the Integral of e^x(lnx) and Anti-Derivative of x^x?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sumerman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the integral of the function e^x(lnx) and the anti-derivative of x^x. It is established that the anti-derivative of x^x(lnx+1) cannot be expressed in terms of elementary functions. The exponential integral function is referenced as a potential tool for understanding the behavior of the integral, but caution is advised due to the divergence of the series involved. Numerical integration methods are suggested as an alternative approach for evaluating these integrals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration and differentiation concepts
  • Familiarity with the exponential integral function
  • Knowledge of series and their convergence properties
  • Basic skills in numerical integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of the exponential integral function
  • Learn about series convergence and divergence in mathematical analysis
  • Explore numerical integration methods such as Simpson's Rule and Trapezoidal Rule
  • Investigate advanced integration techniques, including substitution and integration by parts
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, mathematicians exploring advanced integration techniques, and anyone interested in the properties of special functions like the exponential integral.

sumerman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
i have tried some methods like uv - integral vdu but can't reach the answer
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You won't be able to do it.
 
Try to take the derivative of this with respect to $x$, and see what do you get:

e^x\left[\ln x-\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}(i-1)!x^{-i}\right]
 
Last edited:
cute.
 
tony.c.tan said:
Try to take the derivative of this with respect to $x$, and see what do you get:

e^x\left[\ln x-\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}(i-1)!x^{-i}\right]

Supercool!

Would you show what techniques are useful to get that anti-derivative?
 
tony.c.tan said:
Try to take the derivative of this with respect to $x$, and see what do you get:

e^x\left[\ln x-\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}(i-1)!x^{-i}\right]

Woh! a series that diverges for every x ... what a useful answer ...
 
g_edgar said:
Woh! a series that diverges for every x ... what a useful answer ...

Yeah, i noticed that after a while...

It MIGHT be, that the formula CAN be used, with extreme caution, since we will mainly use differences between two "values" of the anti-derivative. Thos difference might be convergent, even though both terms are not.

But, then again, a numerical integration scheme might do equally well...
 
Last edited:
apologize for my ignorance but what is that process called and the Sigma looking symbol? I am an Yr 12 student currently doing VCE and studying specialist math and is just stumped on an equation hoping to find an answer in here.

NB: excuse me for fail to type with mathematic symbol
Anti-Differentiate x^x=?

But really i am asking how to anti-differentiate x^x(lnx+1) which comes from the derivative of y=x^x
Because out of curiosity i always hold the belief in math if there is a forward operation there should be a backwards operation so if i can differentiate x^x to get that ugly function to anti-differentitate what operations would i have to undergo.

Thanks for the trouble of reading this passage.
 
  • #10
Please start a new thread next time instead of posting to an already existing thread.

norice4u said:
apologize for my ignorance but what is that process called and the Sigma looking symbol?

The Sigma symbol is the summation symbol. It's just the shorthand for a sum. For example

\sum_{i=1}^3 i^2= 1^2+2^2+3^2

Of course, things like \sum_{i=1}^{+\infty} can not be defined as such since the sum would be infinite. Infinite sums are called series in mathematics and have a very big underlying theory.

NB: excuse me for fail to type with mathematic symbol
Anti-Differentiate x^x=?

This function certainly has an anti-derivative, but it can not be written in terms of elementary functions. Most functions do not have elementary anti-derivatives.

But really i am asking how to anti-differentiate x^x(lnx+1) which comes from the derivative of y=x^x

This integral can be solved by an easy substitution.

Because out of curiosity i always hold the belief in math if there is a forward operation there should be a backwards operation so if i can differentiate x^x to get that ugly function to anti-differentitate what operations would i have to undergo.

The "backwards operation" of differentiation is called integration. But integration is much more harder. Where differentiation has nice algorithms which can be used to differentiate all nice functions, the same is not true for integration. Most integrals are not easy to solve.

Anyway, I am locking this thread. Please make a new thread if you have further questions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K