How Do I Correctly Exponentiate in Logarithmic Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vorcil
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
vorcil
Messages
395
Reaction score
0
I solved for the equation

[tex]\frac{f}{2} ln\frac{Tf}{Ti} = - ln \frac{vf}{vi}[/tex]

I know to simplify the equation I need to Exponentiate both sides

[tex] <br /> e^{\frac{f}{2}} * e^{ln\frac{Tf}{Ti}} = e^{ln\frac{vi}{vf}}[/tex]

note i changed [tex]- ln \frac{vf}{vi} \textrm{ too } ln\frac{vi}{vf}[/tex] and removed the negative sign

,

after exponentiating both sides I get

[tex]e^{\frac{f}{2}} * \frac{Tf}{Ti} = \frac{Vi}{Vf}[/tex]

But I'm not sure if I put the f/2 in the right place

My equation should be reading
[tex]{\frac{Tf}{Ti}}^\frac{f}{2}[/tex]
but I don't know how to get to that
from exponentiating [tex]\frac{f}{2} \frac{Tf}{Ti}[/tex]

could someone please expain the rules behind this?

--------------------------------------------

original question:

solve an equation for the work done in adiabatic compression

-

[tex]U = \frac{f}{2} N \kappa T[/tex]

[tex]dU = \frac{f}{2} N \kappa dT[/tex]

the work done during quasistatic compression is -P dv

[tex]\frac{f}{2} N\kappa dT = -P dV[/tex]

using the ideal gas law to write P the pressure in terms of the variables T and v
ideal gas law: [tex]\frac{N \kappa T}{V} = P[/tex]

i get

[tex]\frac{f}{2} N\kappa dT = -\frac{N\kappa T}{V} dv[/tex]

simplifying by canceling out N K gives

[tex]\frac{f}{2} dT = -\frac{T}{V}dv[/tex]

separation of variables because this is a differential equation

[tex] \frac{f}{2} \frac{dT}{T} = -\frac{dV}{V}[/tex]

integrating both sides with respect to initial and final volume/temperatures
I get the equation

[tex]\frac{f}{2} \int_{Ti}^{Tf} \frac{1}{T}dT = -\int_{Vi}^{Vf} \frac{1}{V}dV[/tex]

integrating

[tex]\left \frac{f}{2} lnT \right|_{Ti}^{Tf}= \left -lnV\right|_{Vi}^{Vf}[/tex]

evaluating

[tex]\frac{f}{2} lnTf - lnTi = -lnVf + lnVi[/tex]

noting that lnx - lny is equivalent to ln(x/y)

simplifying to get

[tex]\frac{f}{2} ln\frac{Tf}{Ti} = ln\frac{Vi}{Vf}[/tex]

this is where I was having the exponential problem

exponentiating both sides

do i raise e to the whole of the left side? or the individual parts?
[tex]e^\frac{f}{2} e^{ln\frac{Tf}{Ti}} \textrm{ or do i } e^{\frac{f}{2} ln{Tf}{Ti}[/tex]
what happens to the f/2?
I know each of Tf and Ti should be raised to the power of f/2 afterwards

but I do not understand how that works
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vorcil said:
[tex]\frac{f}{2} ln\frac{Tf}{Ti} = ln\frac{Vi}{Vf}[/tex]

this is where I was having the exponential problem

exponentiating both sides

do i raise e to the whole of the left side? or the individual parts?
[tex]e^\frac{f}{2} e^{ln\frac{Tf}{Ti}} \textrm{ or do i } e^{\frac{f}{2} ln{Tf}{Ti}[/tex]
what happens to the f/2?
I know each of Tf and Ti should be raised to the power of f/2 afterwards

but I do not understand how that works

Quick info about exponentials:

[tex]x^ax^b = x^{(a+b)}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{x^a}{x^b} = x^{(a-b)}[/tex]

[tex](x^a)^b = x^{ab}[/tex]

So, when you exponentiate

[tex]\frac{f}{2} ln\frac{Tf}{Ti} = ln\frac{Vi}{Vf}[/tex]

You get

[tex]e^{\frac{f}{2} ln\frac{T_f}{T_i}} = e^{ln\frac{V_i}{V_f}}[/tex]

But remember that

[tex]\frac{f}{2} ln\frac{T_f}{T_i} = ln(\frac{T_f}{T_i})^{(\frac{f}{2})}[/tex]

Plug-in that on your equation to get

[tex](\frac{T_f}{T_i})^{(\frac{f}{2})} = \frac{V_i}{V_f}[/tex]

Was that what you wanted?

________________________

EDIT:

Instead, if you had done

[tex]e^{\frac{f}{2}}e^{ln\frac{T_f}{T_i}} = e^{ln\frac{V_i}{V_f}}[/tex]

On the left-hand side, you would be implying that

[tex]e^{\frac{f}{2}}e^{ln\frac{T_f}{T_i}} = e^{(\frac{f}{2}+ln\frac{T_f}{T_i})}[/tex]

Which is incorrect, as you can clearly see, because the original expression was

[tex]\frac{f}{2}ln\frac{T_f}{T_i}[/tex]

And not

[tex]\frac{f}{2}+ln\frac{T_f}{T_i}[/tex]

So a quick explanation to your question would be reviewing the first exponential property that I've posted above, that is, the product one.
 
Last edited: