How do I determine the minus sign in gauge transformations?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 3K views
Petar Mali
Messages
283
Reaction score
0
[tex]\vec{B}=rot\vec{A}[/tex]

[tex]\vec{E}=-\frac{\partial\vec{A}}{\partial t}-grad\varphi[/tex]


If I define

[tex]\varphi=\widetilde{\varphi}-\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}[/tex]

[tex]\vec{A}=\widetilde{\vec{A}}+gradf[/tex]

where

[tex]f=f(x,y,z,t)[/tex]

I will get

[tex]\vec{B}=rot\vec{A}=rot\vec{\widetilde{\vec{A}}}[/tex]

[tex]\vec{E}=-\frac{\partial\vec{A}}{\partial t}-grad\varphi=-\frac{\partial\widetilde{\vec{A}}}{\partial t}-grad\widetilde{\varphi}[/tex]

But if I say

[tex]\varphi=\widetilde{\varphi}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}[/tex]

[tex]\vec{A}=\widetilde{\vec{A}}+gradf[/tex]

I wouldn't get that result. How I know how to take minus sign in this relations!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The transformation for A is clear, because you want B to stay the same and you simply exploit the fact that grad(rot F) = 0 for any vector field F.
So then you can simply define [itex]\tilde\phi = \phi + \delta[/itex], write out
[tex]-\frac{\partial \tilde{\vec A}}{\partial t} - \nabla \tilde\phi[/tex]
and see what [itex]\delta[/itex] has to be to cancel the extra term from the [tex]\tilde A[/tex]-derivative so you get
[tex]-\frac{\partial \vec A}{\partial t} - \nabla \phi[/tex]
back.
 
Petar Mali said:
How I know how to take minus sign in this relations!

Another way to see it is with four vectors:

Define the (contravariant) four potential putting together the scalar and vector potential:

[tex]A^\mu=(\phi,\mathbf{A})[/tex]

and define the (covariant) four derivative putting together the time derivative and the gradient:

[tex]\partial_{\mu}=(\partial_t,\nabla)[/tex]

Then the gauge transformation is simply

[tex]A^\mu\longmapsto A^\mu+\partial^\mu f[/tex]

and the fact that you have to raise the index of [tex]\partial_\mu[/tex] yields the minus sign.