How do I determine the minus sign in gauge transformations?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on determining the correct sign in gauge transformations within electromagnetism, specifically regarding the vector potential \(\vec{A}\) and scalar potential \(\varphi\). The participants analyze the transformations defined as \(\varphi=\widetilde{\varphi}-\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}\) and \(\vec{A}=\widetilde{\vec{A}}+gradf\), concluding that the minus sign is essential to maintain the consistency of the magnetic field \(\vec{B}=rot\vec{A}\). They emphasize that the gauge transformation must ensure that the physical quantities remain invariant, which is achieved by carefully manipulating the terms in the equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically the concepts of curl and gradient.
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic theory, particularly gauge transformations.
  • Knowledge of four-vector notation and covariant derivatives in physics.
  • Proficiency in mathematical manipulation of partial derivatives.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of gauge invariance in electromagnetism.
  • Learn about the mathematical framework of four-vectors and their applications in physics.
  • Explore the role of scalar and vector potentials in electromagnetic theory.
  • Investigate the properties of curl and gradient in vector fields.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, particularly those specializing in electromagnetism, as well as students and researchers looking to deepen their understanding of gauge transformations and their mathematical foundations.

Petar Mali
Messages
283
Reaction score
0
[tex]\vec{B}=rot\vec{A}[/tex]

[tex]\vec{E}=-\frac{\partial\vec{A}}{\partial t}-grad\varphi[/tex]


If I define

[tex]\varphi=\widetilde{\varphi}-\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}[/tex]

[tex]\vec{A}=\widetilde{\vec{A}}+gradf[/tex]

where

[tex]f=f(x,y,z,t)[/tex]

I will get

[tex]\vec{B}=rot\vec{A}=rot\vec{\widetilde{\vec{A}}}[/tex]

[tex]\vec{E}=-\frac{\partial\vec{A}}{\partial t}-grad\varphi=-\frac{\partial\widetilde{\vec{A}}}{\partial t}-grad\widetilde{\varphi}[/tex]

But if I say

[tex]\varphi=\widetilde{\varphi}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}[/tex]

[tex]\vec{A}=\widetilde{\vec{A}}+gradf[/tex]

I wouldn't get that result. How I know how to take minus sign in this relations!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The transformation for A is clear, because you want B to stay the same and you simply exploit the fact that grad(rot F) = 0 for any vector field F.
So then you can simply define [itex]\tilde\phi = \phi + \delta[/itex], write out
[tex]-\frac{\partial \tilde{\vec A}}{\partial t} - \nabla \tilde\phi[/tex]
and see what [itex]\delta[/itex] has to be to cancel the extra term from the [tex]\tilde A[/tex]-derivative so you get
[tex]-\frac{\partial \vec A}{\partial t} - \nabla \phi[/tex]
back.
 
Petar Mali said:
How I know how to take minus sign in this relations!

Another way to see it is with four vectors:

Define the (contravariant) four potential putting together the scalar and vector potential:

[tex]A^\mu=(\phi,\mathbf{A})[/tex]

and define the (covariant) four derivative putting together the time derivative and the gradient:

[tex]\partial_{\mu}=(\partial_t,\nabla)[/tex]

Then the gauge transformation is simply

[tex]A^\mu\longmapsto A^\mu+\partial^\mu f[/tex]

and the fact that you have to raise the index of [tex]\partial_\mu[/tex] yields the minus sign.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K