How do I determine the poles of 1/(z^6 + 1) above the y-axis?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the poles of the function 1/(z^6 + 1) that lie above the y-axis. Participants are exploring methods to find the roots of the equation z^6 + 1 = 0, which is relevant for solving a contour integral using the residue theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about finding the poles of 1/(z^6 + 1) and questions the method of writing z as e^(theta + 2kpi)/6.
  • Another participant suggests that the angles corresponding to the roots should be π/6, 3π/6, 5π/6, etc., but does not clarify the implications of these angles.
  • A participant mentions that the roots will plot as the vertices of a hexagon, with specific roots located at (0, i) and (0, -i), indicating a geometric interpretation of the roots.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexity of the roots when using Euler's formula and the difficulty in decomposing the denominator into perfect squares for residue calculation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and confusion regarding the methods to find the roots and poles, indicating that multiple approaches are being discussed without a clear consensus on the best method.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the challenge in dealing with higher-order polynomials and the specific nature of the roots in relation to the y-axis, which may require further exploration of the roots of unity.

Lavabug
Messages
858
Reaction score
37
Kind of stuck (embarrassingly) on determining what poles of the function:

1/(z^6 + 1)

lie above the y-axis (I'm solving a contour integral using the residues theorem).

What's the easiest way to do this? Normally I'd write z as e^(theta + 2kpi)/6 , where theta is the angle that -1 forms with the first quadrant (pi) and solve for 6 values of k but I'm pretty confused on this problem.

Isn't there a more direct way to get all 6 roots of z^6 + 1 = 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Lavabug! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and a pi: π and try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
Lavabug said:
Normally I'd write z as e^(theta + 2kpi)/6 , where theta is the angle that -1 forms with the first quadrant (pi) and solve for 6 values of k but I'm pretty confused on this problem.

I don't understand :redface:

that's π/6, 3π/6, 5π/6, etc …

what's wrong with that? :confused:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Lavabug! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and a pi: π and try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)


I don't understand :redface:

that's π/6, 3π/6, 5π/6, etc …

what's wrong with that? :confused:


Thanks. I'll make an effort to use learn the Tex in following posts, as you can imagine at this time of year I'm in a hurry! :p

Yeah those are the exponents I get that have projections above the y axis, but they're really ugly numbers (solved for them using Euler's formula) to plug into the residues formula. Something tells me I'm doing something wrong, shouldn't my poles be +-i raised to the power of something?

Also how would I decompose the denominator into perfect squares so the (z -z0)^m terms cancel when I calculate the residue? I've only dealt with 2nd, 4th order polys in the denominator but this one has me scratching my head.
 
You are trying to find solutions to z^6 + 1 = 0. This is similar to solving z^6 - 1 = 0, except the solutions to your equation will be rotated. The roots of z^6 + 1 will plot as the vertices of a hexagon, and one vertex will be positioned at (0, i) and one at (0, -i). You should review the topic "Roots of unity" for more details.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K