Hi, thanks for taking the time to help. It's really appreciated.
I have a vague understanding that this question isn't asking for a single answer. Your explanation is helpful.
Isn't it comp, and not proj? (This is what my book gives, at least.) I didn't use it because I don't really understand what it is, and what it is saying.
I'm not sure if I'll be able to type what I'm thinking without it being too confusing... but in the hopes that you can tell me if I've misunderstood, or whatever the case may be... if it is too confusing, I'll make a diagram when I get home from work and post it.
I was trying to go from the fact that given a vector a and vector b, there is an orthogonal that is [tex]b-proj_ab[/tex]. And [tex]proj_ab[/tex] is some constant C times a.
So, if you substitute Ca for [tex]proj_ab[/tex] you get [tex](b-ca) . a = 0[/tex]
and
[tex]a.b - ca . a = 0[/tex]
[tex]a . b = ca . a[/tex]
[tex]\frac{a . b}{a . a} = c[/tex]
so [tex]proj_ab=\frac{a . b}{a . a}a[/tex]
Is this wrong?
edit: Is there a better way to write dot products than just putting a decimal in?