How do I simplify 4x4 det before solving? I am doing somethingwrong

Lenjaku · Nov 23, 2012

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

solve the det
3 1 1 0
-4 5 0 -1
0 7 2 8
2 -1 0 3

2. Relevant equations

3. The attempt at a solution
I am trying to solve it and get a different answer each time so I am doing something I shouldn't obviously.

Ok I am adding rows to other rows
(ex 2*row1 +row2)
Same I do for columns.

When I expend the matrix I pay attention to the + and -
So what is wrong :S

This is what I did (I didn't choose the shortest way because I wanted to make sure I am solving it right but hence something is off :S)

I did 2*R₄+r₂,R₃-2*R₁
I opened the det by a_3,1
And got to this by this point:
1*
-4 5 -1

-6 5 8

0 3 5
then I did
R₁-R₂,3*R₁+R₂
then opened it by a_2,1
I got the det:
6*
5 -19

3 5
Which is 492 (should b 82)
Now in all the cases I tried I reached 82 before multiplying the number outside the 2x2 det (6 in this case)

Well it is kinda hard showing the steps of the det though it is a simple one but mainly is there something wrong with the steps I take?

HallsofIvy · Nov 23, 2012

Lenjaku said: ↑

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

solve the det
3 1 1 0
-4 5 0 -1
0 7 2 8
2 -1 0 3

2. Relevant equations

3. The attempt at a solution
I am trying to solve it and get a different answer each time so I am doing something I shouldn't obviously.

Ok I am adding rows to other rows
(ex 2*row1 +row2)
Same I do for columns.

When I expend the matrix I pay attention to the + and -
So what is wrong :S

This is what I did (I didn't choose the shortest way because I wanted to make sure I am solving it right but hence something is off :S)

I did 2*R₄+r₂

Okay, that's a good start. It gets a 0 in the first column, second row.

,R₃-2*R₁

But I don't understand why you did that? I thought you were trying to get 0s in the first column. This gives you
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}3 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 3 & 0 & 5 \\ -6 & 5 & 0 & 8 \\ 2 & -1 & 0 & 3\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

I opened the det by a_3,1
And got to this by this point:
1*
-4 5 -1

-6 5 8

0 3 5

Perhaps I misunderstood what you meant before. Because you already have two 0s in the third column, if you subtract 2 times the first row from the third row, Replacing R₃ with R₃- 2R₁, you get
[tex]\left|\begin{array}{cccc}3 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\-4 & 5 & 0 & -1\\ -6 & 5 & 0 & 8 \\ 2 & -1 & 0 & 3 \end{array}\right|[/tex]
Expanding on the third column, you get
[tex]1\left|\begin{array}{ccc}4 & 5 & -1 \\ 6 & 5 & 8 \\ 2 & -1 & 3\end{array}\right|[/tex]
Although I still don't see how you got that third row.

Then I did
R₁-R₂,3*R₁+R₂
then opened it by a_2,1
I got the det:
6*
5 -19

3 5
Which is 492 (should b 82)
Now in all the cases I tried I reached 82 before multiplying the number outside the 2x2 det (6 in this case)

Well it is kinda hard showing the steps of the det though it is a simple one but mainly is there something wrong with the steps I take?

HallsofIvy · Nov 23, 2012

Lenjaku said: ↑

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

solve the det
3 1 1 0
-4 5 0 -1
0 7 2 8
2 -1 0 3

2. Relevant equations

3. The attempt at a solution
I am trying to solve it and get a different answer each time so I am doing something I shouldn't obviously.

Ok I am adding rows to other rows
(ex 2*row1 +row2)
Same I do for columns.

When I expend the matrix I pay attention to the + and -
So what is wrong :S

This is what I did (I didn't choose the shortest way because I wanted to make sure I am solving it right but hence something is off :S)

I did 2*R₄+r₂

Okay, that's a good start. It gets a 0 in the first column, second row.

,R₃-2*R₁

But I don't understand why you did that? I thought you were trying to get 0s in the first column. This gives you
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}3 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 3 & 0 & 5 \\ -6 & 5 & 0 & 8 \\ 2 & -1 & 0 & 3\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

I opened the det by a_3,1
And got to this by this point:
1*
-4 5 -1

-6 5 8

0 3 5

Perhaps I misunderstood what you meant before. Because you already have two 0s in the third column, if you subtract 2 times the first row from the third row, Replacing R₃ with R₃- 2R₁, you get
[tex]\left|\begin{array}{cccc}3 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\-4 & 5 & 0 & -1\\ -6 & 5 & 0 & 8 \\ 2 & -1 & 0 & 3 \end{array}\right|[/tex]
Expanding on the third column, you get
[tex]1\left|\begin{array}{ccc}4 & 5 & -1 \\ 6 & 5 & 8 \\ 2 & -1 & 3\end{array}\right|[/tex]
Although I still don't see how you got that third row.

Then I did
R₁-R₂,3*R₁+R₂
then opened it by a_2,1
I got the det:
6*
5 -19

3 5
Which is 492 (should b 82)
Now in all the cases I tried I reached 82 before multiplying the number outside the 2x2 det (6 in this case)

Well it is kinda hard showing the steps of the det though it is a simple one but mainly is there something wrong with the steps I take?

Lenjaku · Nov 23, 2012

Not everything I did had to have a meaning I was playing around with it.
I figured out what I was doing wrong though...I treated it as matrix .
When I write 2R₂+R₃
I actually mean R₂=2R₂+R₃
I didn't know I can't do that with dets or I change its value:S

Millennial · Nov 24, 2012

Row operations of course do change the value of the determinant.
Why don't you try expansion by minors to solve it? Might be a bit tedious, but would work after all.

Log in or Sign up

How do I simplify 4x4 det before solving? I am doing somethingwrong

Lenjaku

HallsofIvy

HallsofIvy

Lenjaku

Millennial

How do i simplify this (Replies: 2)

How do i solve this ? (Replies: 1)

How do i solve this integral? (Replies: 1)

How do i solve this ODE? (Replies: 3)

How do I simplify this? (Replies: 10)