How do I simplify 4x4 det before solving? I am doing somethingwrong

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lenjaku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simplify
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying the determinant of a 4x4 matrix. The original poster is attempting to solve the determinant of a specific matrix but is encountering inconsistencies in their results.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster describes their attempts to simplify the determinant using row operations, such as adding multiples of rows to other rows. They express confusion about the correctness of their steps and the resulting values.
  • Some participants question the rationale behind certain row operations, particularly when they seem to contradict the goal of achieving zeros in specific columns.
  • One participant suggests that the original poster may be misunderstanding how row operations affect the determinant's value.
  • Another participant proposes using expansion by minors as an alternative method for solving the determinant.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the original poster's approach and questioning the validity of their steps. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of expansion by minors, but no consensus has been reached on the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates they are trying to ensure their method is correct, suggesting a desire for thoroughness in their approach. There is also a mention of confusion regarding the treatment of row operations in relation to determinants.

Lenjaku
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



solve the det
3 1 1 0
-4 5 0 -1
0 7 2 8
2 -1 0 3

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am trying to solve it and get a different answer each time so I am doing something I shouldn't obviously.

Ok I am adding rows to other rows
(ex 2*row1 +row2)
Same I do for columns.

When I expend the matrix I pay attention to the + and -
So what is wrong :S

This is what I did (I didn't choose the shortest way because I wanted to make sure I am solving it right but hence something is off :S)

I did 2*R4+r2,R3-2*R1
I opened the det by a3,1
And got to this by this point:
1*
-4 5 -1​
-6 5 8​
0 3 5​
then I did
R1-R2,3*R1+R2
then opened it by a2,1
I got the det:
6*
5 -19​
3 5​
Which is 492 (should b 82)
Now in all the cases I tried I reached 82 before multiplying the number outside the 2x2 det (6 in this case)


Well it is kinda hard showing the steps of the det though it is a simple one but mainly is there something wrong with the steps I take?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lenjaku said:

Homework Statement



solve the det
3 1 1 0
-4 5 0 -1
0 7 2 8
2 -1 0 3

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am trying to solve it and get a different answer each time so I am doing something I shouldn't obviously.

Ok I am adding rows to other rows
(ex 2*row1 +row2)
Same I do for columns.

When I expend the matrix I pay attention to the + and -
So what is wrong :S

This is what I did (I didn't choose the shortest way because I wanted to make sure I am solving it right but hence something is off :S)

I did 2*R4+r2
Okay, that's a good start. It gets a 0 in the first column, second row.

,R3-2*R1
But I don't understand why you did that? I thought you were trying to get 0s in the first column. This gives you
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}3 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 3 & 0 & 5 \\ -6 & 5 & 0 & 8 \\ 2 & -1 & 0 & 3\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

I opened the det by a3,1
And got to this by this point:
1*
-4 5 -1​
-6 5 8​
0 3 5​
Perhaps I misunderstood what you meant before. Because you already have two 0s in the third column, if you subtract 2 times the first row from the third row, Replacing R3 with R3- 2R1, you get
[tex]\left|\begin{array}{cccc}3 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\-4 & 5 & 0 & -1\\ -6 & 5 & 0 & 8 \\ 2 & -1 & 0 & 3 \end{array}\right|[/tex]
Expanding on the third column, you get
[tex]1\left|\begin{array}{ccc}4 & 5 & -1 \\ 6 & 5 & 8 \\ 2 & -1 & 3\end{array}\right|[/tex]
Although I still don't see how you got that third row.

Then I did
R1-R2,3*R1+R2
then opened it by a2,1
I got the det:
6*
5 -19​
3 5​
Which is 492 (should b 82)
Now in all the cases I tried I reached 82 before multiplying the number outside the 2x2 det (6 in this case)


Well it is kinda hard showing the steps of the det though it is a simple one but mainly is there something wrong with the steps I take?
 
Lenjaku said:

Homework Statement



solve the det
3 1 1 0
-4 5 0 -1
0 7 2 8
2 -1 0 3

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am trying to solve it and get a different answer each time so I am doing something I shouldn't obviously.

Ok I am adding rows to other rows
(ex 2*row1 +row2)
Same I do for columns.

When I expend the matrix I pay attention to the + and -
So what is wrong :S

This is what I did (I didn't choose the shortest way because I wanted to make sure I am solving it right but hence something is off :S)

I did 2*R4+r2
Okay, that's a good start. It gets a 0 in the first column, second row.

,R3-2*R1
But I don't understand why you did that? I thought you were trying to get 0s in the first column. This gives you
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}3 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 3 & 0 & 5 \\ -6 & 5 & 0 & 8 \\ 2 & -1 & 0 & 3\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

I opened the det by a3,1
And got to this by this point:
1*
-4 5 -1​
-6 5 8​
0 3 5​
Perhaps I misunderstood what you meant before. Because you already have two 0s in the third column, if you subtract 2 times the first row from the third row, Replacing R3 with R3- 2R1, you get
[tex]\left|\begin{array}{cccc}3 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\-4 & 5 & 0 & -1\\ -6 & 5 & 0 & 8 \\ 2 & -1 & 0 & 3 \end{array}\right|[/tex]
Expanding on the third column, you get
[tex]1\left|\begin{array}{ccc}4 & 5 & -1 \\ 6 & 5 & 8 \\ 2 & -1 & 3\end{array}\right|[/tex]
Although I still don't see how you got that third row.

Then I did
R1-R2,3*R1+R2
then opened it by a2,1
I got the det:
6*
5 -19​
3 5​
Which is 492 (should b 82)
Now in all the cases I tried I reached 82 before multiplying the number outside the 2x2 det (6 in this case)


Well it is kinda hard showing the steps of the det though it is a simple one but mainly is there something wrong with the steps I take?
 
Not everything I did had to have a meaning I was playing around with it.
I figured out what I was doing wrong though...I treated it as matrix .
When I write 2R2+R3
I actually mean R2=2R2+R3
I didn't know I can't do that with dets or I change its value:S
 
Row operations of course do change the value of the determinant.
Why don't you try expansion by minors to solve it? Might be a bit tedious, but would work after all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K